Move Clojure and Femtolisp

Move Clojure and Femtolisp

[Pierre Neidhardt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 255 bytes --]

Hi!

I've noticed that Femtolisp and Clojure are part of lisp.scm.
In my opinion Femtolisp should belong to scheme.scm, while Clojure
should probably end up in a separate clojure.scm file.

Thoughts?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]

Re: Move Clojure and Femtolisp

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello!

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

> I've noticed that Femtolisp and Clojure are part of lisp.scm.
> In my opinion Femtolisp should belong to scheme.scm, while Clojure
> should probably end up in a separate clojure.scm file.
>
> Thoughts?

No opinion here.  What do Andy Patterson and Alex Vong think?  :-)

Ludo’.

Re: Move Clojure and Femtolisp

[Gábor Boskovits]

Hello,

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. nov.
23., P, 10:25):
>
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed that Femtolisp and Clojure are part of lisp.scm.
> In my opinion Femtolisp should belong to scheme.scm, while Clojure
> should probably end up in a separate clojure.scm file.
>
> Thoughts?
>

I have no opinion on Femtolisp.

I believe having clojure.scm would be good, as clojure packgages
really can grow in number.
It would be nice to have that in a shape where we can create a build
system for it.

> --
> Pierre Neidhardt
> https://ambrevar.xyz/

g_bor

Re: Move Clojure and Femtolisp

[Alex Vong]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 623 bytes --]

Hello Pierre,

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> Hi!
>
> I've noticed that Femtolisp and Clojure are part of lisp.scm.
> In my opinion Femtolisp should belong to scheme.scm, while Clojure
> should probably end up in a separate clojure.scm file.
>
> Thoughts?

For femtolisp, I think we could move it if it is indeed a scheme.

For clojure, I move it from 'java.scm' to 'lisp.scm' because it is a
lisp. But is 'lisp.scm' actually for common lisp only? In any case, I
think we would have to move it to a separate file after the # of
packages reached a certain level so we may as well move it now.

Thanks,
Alex

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

Re: Move Clojure and Femtolisp

[Pierre Neidhardt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 387 bytes --]


> For clojure, I move it from 'java.scm' to 'lisp.scm' because it is a
> lisp. But is 'lisp.scm' actually for common lisp only? 

It's customary to refer to Common Lisp as "lisp" only.

All package in lisp.scm are Common Lisp packages.

Clojure is effectively a different language and won't run any of the packages in
lisp.scm.

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]

Re: Move Clojure and Femtolisp

[Alex Vong]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 414 bytes --]

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:

>> For clojure, I move it from 'java.scm' to 'lisp.scm' because it is a
>> lisp. But is 'lisp.scm' actually for common lisp only? 
>
> It's customary to refer to Common Lisp as "lisp" only.
>
I see!

[...]
>
> Clojure is effectively a different language and won't run any of the packages in
> lisp.scm.

This is another good reason supporting the move.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

Re: Move Clojure and Femtolisp

[Pierre Neidhardt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 55 bytes --]

Done!

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]