From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsU7r-0002tp-BE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:01:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsU7q-0007qs-GH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:01:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsU7q-0007qc-Cf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:01:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsU7q-0003dd-9i for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:01:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#32953] [PATCH core-updates-next 0/8] Use GCC7 as the default compiler. Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20181006131420.8131-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87ftxjhux0.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a7krb5hf.fsf@gnu.org> <20181229175833.GU2581@macbook41> <8736psiu9h.fsf@fastmail.com> <20190119170904.GF25281@macbook41> <20190119200119.GA13339@macbook41> <871s4kpswz.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 16:00:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <871s4kpswz.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Wed, 06 Feb 2019 21:23:56 +0100") Message-ID: <87a7j5t39z.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 32953@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Marius, Marius Bakke skribis: > Efraim Flashner writes: > >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 07:09:04PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: >>>=20 >>> I'm going to see if I can build hello --target=3Darm-linux-gnueabihf ne= xt >>> and see how that works. >> >> When I get to gcc-cross-arm-linux-gnueabihf it fails during configure, >> cannot find gmp.h. Looking at (gnu packages cross-base), I don't think >> there are any package-inputs for xgcc. I still thought gcc bundled its >> own gmp et. al. > > I'm happy to report that the cross-compilation issues are resolved with > this trivial patch: Awesome! I think you could squash this with the =E2=80=9Cgnu: Use GCC 7 as= the default compiler.=E2=80=9D commit, and then go ahead and push. I=E2=80=99m happy we=E2=80=99ll soon have a more recent base compiler! Thank you, Ludo=E2=80=99.