From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhvVX-0007Qn-Dl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 08:34:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhvVV-0004xx-J5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 08:34:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhvVS-0004vM-0z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 08:34:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhvVR-0002xX-Re for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 08:34:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#35790] [PATCH] scripts: lint: Handle warnings with a record type. Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20190518093206.22069-1-mail@cbaines.net> <878suz27ke.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef4dxgvl.fsf@cbaines.net> <87pnnpj15u.fsf@gnu.org> <87h88pu1cc.fsf@cbaines.net> <875zp0lbmx.fsf@gnu.org> <875zovmqey.fsf@cbaines.net> <87pnn3cr7f.fsf@gnu.org> <87y31kli4q.fsf@cbaines.net> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 14:32:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y31kli4q.fsf@cbaines.net> (Christopher Baines's message of "Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:56:37 +0100") Message-ID: <87a7dyoryh.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Christopher Baines Cc: 35790@debbugs.gnu.org Hi! Christopher Baines skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> Christopher Baines skribis: >> >>> Thanks, so if I set the bindtextdomain, things do indeed work >>> better. So, regarding these two patches, I've got the following things >>> on my mind... >>> >>> - As they change so many things, I'm not sure what to add for the GNU >>> changelog at the end of the commit message? >> >> I think you should try to write the commit log the usual way, by >> listing every changed entity. It=E2=80=99s a bit tedious, but it=E2=80= =99s also a good >> way to review everything (and Magit makes it relatively easy.) > > Ok, I've now made an initial attempt at this, and sent some updated > patches. Perfect, thanks for taking the time to do it. Time to push! :-) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.