From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: next: Compress the executable.
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:43:45 +0200
Message-ID: <87a7an8bfy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <20190905095602.15524.75425@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20190905095603.AC57A209A5@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <874l1qgc1j.fsf@elephly.net> <871rwuc3es.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87blvu32qm.fsf@gnu.org> <878sqxq4ga.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <875zm0co0t.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h85ipo14.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87muf9n8sc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <8736gw6xrh.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87y2yonng4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k19tg63u.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87v9tcm8ws.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0fjb5hi.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60615)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1iEZUM-0007N8-Gq
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:43:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1iEZUL-0007b6-8S
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:43:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87d0fjb5hi.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

True.

I've been using Btrfs for my data for a little while and I'm very happy
with it.

I wonder how Btrfs fares for a Guix system.  In many ways, Guix
supersedes many of the features of Btrfs (snapshots and deduplication in
particular).  So I wonder if it's not redundant and possibly incurs a
waste of energy.

What's your experience, Maxim?

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl2QtREACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH/QZwf/cdztkFgiEVALpnf7jTZEyxtQ8wxtq1IREr4YHKFzgC5Tx/0kZHRxA+qB
XifdwmW/YaiMzF7zXWy+C4mqHhnwlF+LRRIf8TJDaIfJt11djw7xqX7oeIxjxbet
LMl0pGk4RMeECJUOfa3lVuCAw+npJxuNsjwpNpZN/FrJVKCTDL6jEFNkSkAfts5q
wlVhiFJyH7C802w0ha5Z9/sf/3vuFwihxIWQO2xYkQggkQmpu/+3+HfAVQ74Eg7a
ziFqmJUs2JOV7PyYt4EG2/4JZnDU7ArXObZPf1WqDtKwNGPelPg2XmT2myFhtA9n
VbfXwf9iaaCTnaYyiIVlMWdJGPNkGw==
=d4X+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--