From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#40599: 1.1.0rc2 i686 gui install unreadable Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:42:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87a73evzu3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871rorxzpw.fsf@ficus.lan> <87pncb3yyk.fsf@gnu.org> <871roqusha.fsf@ficus.lan> <20200414132200.ikfbj2famdaamfbd@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOP5a-0006Of-HQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:11:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOP5S-00027H-3V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:11:10 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOP5S-000275-0J for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:11:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jOP5R-0006KH-Ru for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:11:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200414132200.ikfbj2famdaamfbd@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:22:00 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: 40599@debbugs.gnu.org, Niels Felsted --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Niels & Florian, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:06:25PM +0200, Niels Felsted wrote: >> And testing Florians suggestions: >>=20 >> setting 'nomodeset' kernel parameter -> screen displays fine >>=20 >> setting 'modprobe.blacklist=3Di915' kernel parameter -> screen displays = fine >>=20 >> As mentioned before, I did manage to install guix via tty3 (without >> setting any kernel parameters), and it boots up fine with >> gdm3/xfce4. So it is only the initial boot from the install iso that's >> distorted. > > Thank you for the testing! Xorg working confirms that uvesafb really > is the source of the problem. This is good to know. I have hope that > this issue is fixed by commit 0ad60b2a89d6d387236466e0bcdd61ac489fca37 > that loads uvesafb only if it cannot already detect a frame buffer > device. I do not have a downloadable image for confirming the fix > though. Niels, here=E2=80=99s a new ISO image built from commit bd4c345ef7ddf3542662fe0872b06393b414a3fc, which includes Florian=E2=80=99s = fix. https://web.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/guix/1.1.0rc2.5/ Could you simply boot that image, without any additional kernel arguments, and confirm that the installer now displays correctly? (You don=E2=80=99t need to run the actual install.) Thanks in advance, Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEPORkVYqE/cadtAz7CQsRmT2a67UFAl6V2dQACgkQCQsRmT2a 67Wt1BAAlkHODRL8crqiHBf8kClirrCr2MhWSl2gh6KV2r2W8pArJYCFD3fT4D5q XfIbe/sXoh8hdtq4ma7LoDFYZqntOHgPdafjYJJjwtRe7tlZHWkDNlwfUwb14FoD NT290PBd7y03MUkW5uKgnfPu/Z5tbjPDvpTqYYGT9UxgIyh3QIrE2W80NX5xZJTa aEqcjwY/cFxKplQf61CFRnXCM+iqGRNJZk7BCCJ5/sPx1PUDacyIasxxfvJHI4XS RTum9iAN/tqnhqIKAV73AWu6Vbi9mG8UrSTyr+iIT2qlT5T77hbWvhtVZmkTAb2t ltbZHwg6HyMh9MmVHSwVKGopskMFwd+JnZl4HLsv62zRgR6xm7wjmz4L3TlfJch1 bxXQT9phgfwQLJf2bmsAMSemGs1MFC7NPNxN/Ct8ts6ZeUHM0pAG1gESyBM5COi8 ROwk8mRPuju/WitDcIYsgPrNvCiK+mvaqYu0P21d+eDB6jo431l0XnZfltY0LnRJ LOWkmLLu5PPqXFS+81iMJapXSFLehjowKiOCVxHwjhckYHCx7Vcw9F07jwT5zE5h uNqpXUDrHzkI+aGLi/4NMxqd/pUea1XGSIgEJZCqhF1TLLU3q6SPNj4LmFgNnxFd KDEATV2YJ61l83b5q9oIxDbxnTXNhnmCDZLdhQ8v9CGQ9851ff8= =PsSO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--