From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id jZkRJfFelF8TRgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:05:53 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id OOleIPFelF/dUwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:05:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE10D940111 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35866 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWMzF-0003sF-H0 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:05:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWMvn-0008Bk-JQ for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:02:15 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:41507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWMvk-0005kI-CR for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:02:15 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD67C2400FC for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:02:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1603558929; bh=v7HxjPRjlDROImGJLyI9CiooGsEm7Y1O7+sqHF3YPTs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=VvEdL+yiTk1frK5AprsVIdXFy2JmsuiA8xYPqgXlgRhfoy8+7PNUjH7yy3mlI+2bX KFJjWDdzFOVMjCxJhLZuotC1kRN5ksCLkfVMYP5++a2GK9pis6FJDUbBStaDs6w7Ej G07cFuYgZhqTuJfBWV5TOPtDnYkuKTxM2PO3J4BeE39fqGcxfMQ0GDxrg0PrZ7TFlU m4AiqpnIbf0tqwSEgiZVlLzZFcEex0Kvg3SgPml1MIz7DAWsB2SxuvkThhuriJfBij HCMxAuGwY0Xe2TLijsaiI3y6Ye94mX2k/ol8c2eMwr1OiFebyTkwhE0rpAiYtNr6vh baZx/AFfOxhZw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CJS7h69RCz6tmD; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:02:08 +0200 (CEST) References: <86imb32r0k.fsf@gmail.com> <87d017k2ds.fsf@yamatai> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Adam Kandur Subject: Re: problem with common lisp In-reply-to: Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:02:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87a6wbk16a.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/24 13:02:10 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Help Guix Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=VvEdL+yi; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.31 X-TUID: 7QAiEJ0HBD6g --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Adam Kandur skribis: > Hi! thank you for this question. dont have to much knowledge about cpu. i attached lscpu output. if you find something interesting in it, let me know, please > > Oct 24, 2020, 16:35 by glv@posteo.net: > >> >> Adam Kandur via skribis: >> >>> hi, i realized that i have this problem with sbcl itself, if i install sbcl in my main profile (without any of my packages, only sbcl from guix channel) i still got this error: >>> >>> fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 1954 tid 1954: >>> Unhandled SIGILL at 0x52000e9d. >>> >> >> Out of curiosity, what does the "lscpu" command return on your machine >> (the flags in particular)? >> According to [1], there is a bug in SBCL 2.0.9 that causes an illegal instruction error on CPUs that support the popcnt instruction but not the AVX instructions. It it the case of your CPU. This bug has been fixed in the master branch of SBCL's repository, so the next version of SBCL (which will be released soon I think) should work on your machine. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/sbcl/comments/j824cs/does_binary_209_require_some_fancy_x86/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCX5ReDQ8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j8tEgD+P92qdbRwJKwU8jcLV2AffUhDmpjk8mIewPwI IvrdutsBAJut7LXm2qxzj4DV20twPqr2+hF0/glMMTJa3mUplgxd =Z4RT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--