From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id eNgfH6vwymBjGgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:50:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id uPAjGqvwymCqaAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:50:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258DFDCEE for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:50:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39334 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltlqw-0000D9-NO for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 02:50:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltlql-0000D0-0i for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 02:50:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltlqk-00081T-K3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 02:50:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltlqk-0002xV-Eh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 02:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#48985] [PATCH] gnu: libressl: Remove search paths. Resent-From: Brice Waegeneire Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48985 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 48985@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 48985-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48985.162391258511341 (code B ref 48985); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 48985) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2021 06:49:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltlqS-0002wq-Sg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 02:49:45 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:51639) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltlqR-0002wc-D9 for 48985@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 02:49:43 -0400 Received: (Authenticated sender: brice@waegenei.re) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C28B60003; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:49:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Brice Waegeneire References: <20210612212430.13332-1-brice@waegenei.re> <87wnqto7cl.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:49:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wnqto7cl.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:57:46 +0200") Message-ID: <87a6npyohv.fsf_-_@waegenei.re> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1623912619; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=9b4HZYFD/naCjvsx8OLiWpGmSvqADss+nej0xuq9m8E=; b=gbYmVh8SafS0oRGWYt7BIFhnWyTmJEhL+dIvOo0RYjQM1LadqY2U4NHyI3ur24QDZc8Oo/ IkIlquww1+diDvh4JTUyUX38FgbvXczvyWw32EumPoapIEkz6/8YcYnznl+AUqFhqwEbnS 1sRz0vHl1siPC7Bamm/76CNpJbJjvRrglsD5fqV+FJmxYT9Qbp2Bwz0kFjVNEQGrLJniUT tqj4HqgSrYEPHLjKQQVUuAwtyHuLmmfOhaNelXYaaKJ9HtNJK+cebMbDKyPPLhF/ddVrFT U/IciL+vatqg1+JWQtNLRo4IX0GClbnLoKpVprQbBPuKn5NAshm677dyUR11pQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1623912619; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CRMeJdM30Nt052x70JdRJj4u2bYhD5ZgEhnbbZAKmORl+ekZKF0t65DNK3YSxZi9fxSBPR pWpYO1Lyv72prulJSPDP2hMgXMOfwvy7j4K66D9bAW2euCOK5k/wqJbIkKh+2ydk0G/wvo Kz490DutnVadYGJ5DAPsMJKery4jTyDcP8Nx42L8r42gED5ZdCae0D14oXDiHhnDP7fI5k 2V7MKulOQJwaTddOeIlwQx7RyZjITOf6dVZcve8Ltmwbvvp4i9LRuVyzMOKKkr9BUW233o Yrm51qmEd56nBoHziHwefwqJjVk6BgEdzSMUEikhpuMuPkZqwcs9xb/01t9wgg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.42 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 258DFDCEE X-Spam-Score: -2.42 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: ZWRql7HBhRwe Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Brice Waegeneire skribis: >> - ,(string-append "--with-cacert=3D" >> - (assoc-ref %build-inputs "l= ibressl") >> - "/etc/ssl/cert.pem")) >> + `(#:configure-flags (list "--with-privsep-user=3Dntpd" >> + "--localstatedir=3D/var" >> + (string-append "--with-cacert=3D" >> + (assoc-ref %build-inputs = "libressl") >> + "/share/libressl-" >> + ,(package-version libress= l) >> + "/cert.pem")) > > So the etc/ssl/cert.pm file name was wrong for a while? No, the file existed and was used properly. I forgot to mention explicitly that libressl used to put it's SSL configuration in etc/ssl, I moved it to share/libressl-$version/ as does openssl. > Note: instead of (package-version libressl), we should look at the > libressl input of =E2=80=98this-package=E2=80=99, though it=E2=80=99s pro= bably not big deal > here. I tired to correct it, missed. But I have fixed it in the second commit. :/ > Otherwise LGTM, thanks! Pushed as 76a9bad380111493b5a1422485f941de799c6c90 and d65bd74411ab4820318311062b0f327b139a5784. Cheers, - Brice