From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id WAdJJaj2MWOR1AAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:59:52 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id oEhXJKj2MWPB1QAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:59:52 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36A6528B31 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:59:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52794 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1octKZ-0006qm-2M for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:59:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocsE2-0008WI-PI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:49:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocsE2-0003Z3-GQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:49:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ocsE2-0002p6-6o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#58084: guix deploy fails, leaving the newly installed system generation active Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58084 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 58084@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 58084-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58084.166421450010805 (code B ref 58084); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 58084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2022 17:48:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51713 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ocsDM-0002oD-IB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:48:20 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]:40899) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ocsDK-0002nz-Jk for 58084@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:48:18 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f172.google.com with SMTP id cj27so4569960qtb.7 for <58084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:48:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=KMVrnzOacOa83LPDihi/uX7bSmOJlX4PS/n0qfUZo1M=; b=NRqsSxwVqJmMH6n3bWeUTgQnh0MPiAoX+S8tHdanZR6MLBYzIdDgKh8Amu0dtG1J3G 0pV1R8ZlIK3xJtlnY+BBE1bs1+5GrirTANsAijiXTLOBWEN7YLlLmeuGujpmPbllOg2G Zkd7wnAFtSeuRPveryyrXiXItdY98bxES0uNXYLi4f1wHLxRAb2sNswKBz5lhkVJbRs6 4Xo5/d9H3nu3W16CnuKtGLkRtRD41TRtdf5juIkErZl9MO6VHOifOFB9KurBBkjXCoLN G7fTH4cZpA9R+qqRiZu7RwI7Bm1eMMpBwuvcE5dHV8qNmwf+4ugZdpItdSsukQKO6bBy wg8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=KMVrnzOacOa83LPDihi/uX7bSmOJlX4PS/n0qfUZo1M=; b=yPfNFdfatYHifO+MDNe3RYzDZn/fRShTEqmRWi/A3tID3V70d/BZrDb0doHrbYOsuG xvf4JuZMko2dMif3F2XwZUfcOEHboRkHH2JvUsrFnXbMOlFKms0UXRvNPztF2ITmO0+T 3Yx9ZOG4+UhzROpV3y1vbbclodr7rzVgEDruwmce0gcxdwGCIGbRqA/F+aS8wRAmM6y/ c6JXL5PLiq2NgQ/QaxBWEeyFOhGI++YRtIM5Q0EApdY9ftq3vV0WBnx8cs5pLRnOdCAU EHs66RO2vp+ILBPLTXhP+DdlNtqewyD+Em6oKA3FQTY9d/KNdhy5o+1jMTP7HyYw19UX iR7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2hVaDXV5PWFcUwgHj+MLZfyh29aBH4gl1wjVNKhIJwvSFC63+l JwOdaNUKOXixgq18UXK2u9aMqMdIJFc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5YGGkuvKu/QCd0BiYiUhzJKBEk2XuZBvL4+j4R3qkywturN6ep1jxLRz1m+awCfrIw1e4cnw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:252:b0:35d:482f:e105 with SMTP id c18-20020a05622a025200b0035d482fe105mr2074796qtx.92.1664214492629; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-132-99.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.132.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bn5-20020a05622a1dc500b00342b7e4241fsm11066863qtb.77.2022.09.26.10.48.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <8735ce7tdv.fsf@gmail.com> <87h70ukuuz.fsf@gnu.org> <87h70uyqoj.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:48:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h70uyqoj.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:46:20 -0400") Message-ID: <87a66myqlg.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1664218792; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=KMVrnzOacOa83LPDihi/uX7bSmOJlX4PS/n0qfUZo1M=; b=aW0VsoaiW16dP5wBBaQ5jGmcb9DN28QtcoF+JXD6mKLPrR09oitvRESSsOZs+KVZiKaKC1 uTf8Aq3FewbvRSjCzxDp1IonDkyV3HycgQaIB4S9xivhXm4EPfO3KpE/K9Rs2+HKl/6Dtk gMsYBF1R0/alTGSBcHnO8kOFMddIM7QWVuyZFaNaYHgDiawr9fML9oviDvTR5UmznYTNtg bPGwfdesSU5OoTlbcHR193/51uUG0p8h3C0RxziilDZsGKvDRCt5yOcNqs+X5LcaInof20 QH1AbeXFhOg0d6BXMDYi0au+DS+wHocBolqy2cM89d+eldCNVPR9hEcnjm5rhA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1664218792; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EpBZfQ/0RoYIb4+35lhixpfkVukBEhwQQ1k6xUzrGSkDOQk5zvIVu/y5Oe3BLrPGzloV1x mcNRJ2KV3Jyk1ztxY9PkGsnPKWA0pgdZjkzixQ34W7I/ZMXcWotihCJ0XgO7wDLSV2sCf/ acmuXwwDliP6b/FdRtFw+RdN37p+9sZwb/AErW7JqXM0Qibpeg6fOREcUtTzgpUepHI1Gf KbzqtiigGK+T/mT/A+DPVAKCrFxwAHk0efrtUHwWsiF4hXdf5O9NPf/1wFxB9tbv+oOGCz oh0Zmq/brIsf+DOarrdJ0lqvYTQRdHog0YsKzOCsRBYHjyuLAU/rX9CBqVCyyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NRqsSxwV; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 7.65 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NRqsSxwV; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 36A6528B31 X-Spam-Score: 7.65 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: rBw1LIUd7VBs Hello again, Maxim Cournoyer writes: [...] >> =E2=80=A6 which is fine, except that there was already a pre-existing >> /etc/modprobe.d directory (coming from openSuSE, the distro that was >> initially installed on this machine), which caused this activation code >> to break: > > Oh wow! Should we be extra careful and always rm files before linking to > their location? Or define our own 'symlink' procedure that'd take care > of it? That's not very elegant but better than obscure crashes like > this. I just had a better idea: fail and report that an unexpected file was found there, leaving the user to inspect it and choose a proper action. Thanks, Maxim