From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id wADPKRptuGOR0wAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 19:48:58 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id yDW/KRptuGOFNwAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 19:48:58 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594823ACF3 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 19:48:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDrlg-0005iP-9f; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 13:48:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDrle-0005fd-9x for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 13:48:38 -0500 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([2600:3c01:e000:267:0:a171:de7:c]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDrlc-000384-EW for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 13:48:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:40]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@cascadia.debian.net) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EE271AB39; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:48:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=debian.org; s=1.vagrant.user; t=1673030913; bh=83G2nAoNWgS6F8CSZvE6sG1LMJbnbbV4u/LnDvRubz0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=EwVq7ohXvdpI92w2tAgB1+uw0lj0kByBRRBWdwtlL+eHZ6R77Xk+Req7TQ9H0kjXE dwsHDIdHjYvAn9awrvZpqVE8T3y3gxCEQeLiQ7RZxIG+WIDe+/DvClGKeaXJvtNA4Q ze6ooSfxGjZhokx2F4q8bAH4E1VnFXCrI10nfHGJoVrN8nH/XfUCKkje8uv4iPrFrs z8/+KdG0QeCDVXaTBTA/V4q685uG5Eog8qgK05Ik963i+Au6VVUq7fx4C2mIiydJSR B61hNnxo7y8/ugbVxscmwvLp7rLeSuN/TwzroJV0ossK36Juqye8u6bliQvzieaNkI D4V9FDL5swqwg== From: Vagrant Cascadian To: zimoun , Adam Faiz , atai@atai.org Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: guix package build: can distcc be used? In-Reply-To: <87zgavhcby.fsf@gmail.com> References: <6044245d-5533-4994-9316-d6a227e67e3d@disroot.org> <87zgavhcby.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 10:48:29 -0800 Message-ID: <87a62vjy82.fsf@yucca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: none client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:267:0:a171:de7:c; envelope-from=vagrant@debian.org; helo=cascadia.aikidev.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1673030938; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=FDCzvNLmQKgJFAalt+UTDZcq8zXkuEl8FnxDIm6raKlmQ5ATXvWxBRMRtMY+FsFqBQEu7g Ddt31KSaiw8E1WUzK3aeyWB71KSJBYYhY2M6ipTv2Sr3KdOVYWdDVCUOhOce4g1Y5lu3RV oZhezNApbPDMK0sLNzIvApqCVqga/vaWVPookByz6L6gsXyMHr9N143Q8QS4VJprmT73Tg jJhPLVslvZz92++pDBFDsmDkMvvHuwSdRyj2UVUtBRqHNmnrfy0CLt40hgJzC9e0Ye7CX6 e3U2WuNDr0WpwnAHcr7aiYiF3RTdV4kQqWhTIBOjHZTJnFPNNJvuW+fGpibfqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debian.org header.s=1.vagrant.user header.b=EwVq7ohX; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1673030938; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=9p3XdUBjqq4LKo5AifqBK+rp4leR45s1D7+nvI9d7N8=; b=H+TXW9zM7EO9aR7mPCF9nQfyQNVlnkWkTg9mJ2pbstLzRIi4YR6T4K0tXOptWqfGUh9yzQ pK8kkaPGq/zHCcN1gTgdACv7vuqDlvG2zjf8NLysKvB8KmtNbduPZri6XYaM8pLlrcp7LL DclLlgcrCIK3mFvUreOwwqLVYk/sU6aAXG+EStEB7VfwFJKjS4qoQ2Z63sf3xc8VB60aQ4 SSqJ3t+qsZlUlLJO3NQuro/7WldxOKZ87V68cYTccy9gKgZ+XpBEYpZhlbHC1I9aTtLYFv 62NjZ8qtTGpA6Kd2Zjxxte8He0NsNoOrGoAuJoIIM1btHqwT/JVKdLyB2ZEXwA== X-Spam-Score: -9.94 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 594823ACF3 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debian.org header.s=1.vagrant.user header.b=EwVq7ohX; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.94 X-TUID: kP3pnnPW6epx --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2023-01-06, zimoun wrote: > On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 at 18:21, Adam Faiz wrote: > >> It's unknown whether implementing usage of distcc and enabling it in=20 >> `guix build` will affect bit-for-bit reproducibility of packages. > > The question is how isolated the distributed computational environments > are. > >> The distcc feature request and adding distcc to guix's dependency=20 >> closure and should be discussed further on guix-devel before implementin= g. > > Personally, I am missing what distcc brings compared to the current > Guix offload mechanism. Could you (distcc user) elaborate? I believe distcc would allow sending the workload of individual parts of a single package to multiple machines, so a bit finer grained than guix offload, which can only send a single package (or more accurately, derivation?) to each of the offloading machines, if I understand correctly. live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCY7hs/QAKCRDcUY/If5cW qqZ9AP9JW695YZ8H4rWyvQ+gkeTvnb/4Xq+mXVpjr++KGSJOKwD/dHPVw+yAAA7E 2j5gVeRUllAg/T/7Vo+r2IQIPPG7XwY= =DamR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--