From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0PLtDVvG2WYMfQAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 14:55:23 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0PLtDVvG2WYMfQAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 16:55:23 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=edJQB3fG; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=inria.fr header.s=dc header.b=Ci7BrBQJ; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=inria.fr (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1725548123; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=MljfRCtMSyFvFfV/2kflVplFTymKuAYFZCEOuyQma1o=; b=NLWGcjT8Xx/b75S7p0CdA/rlSv/Omf2L1dQftW/nWH/z7ble0Z1/gAx4ES9ZMnq345l4Q3 wpIEqLXTykouU9BT80sfNqrDGft7IhcEWevknHeUEhcIZUPvJZVTkwpKRGBM6YNZlL3TZ6 wsvxl4I1RAW2jHTYTRtC3i2vMq+vpG4iLT+0qrAl1G/emxSKub3Y09bNmr1e2um1bFc65y 0Z/LGrkwe0LhxM02tUsLH0fL+XACYQUDV1KnBP2XdhRUU4lQymLeokHXnOff+j1DZzTLz4 KI2IhFJtPoakePW79SdLEDjLv/VKwTjYS5DSNQRUDuCnv5F4pKcsypUz9T4jRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=edJQB3fG; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=inria.fr header.s=dc header.b=Ci7BrBQJ; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=inria.fr (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1725548123; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QIH5HW8MP3t7eUQjz0Mz4bYpJiHoRUohld92j/dIa2k5NvodH14ZNAGeftmhG96VZMDbuk N77wTKIqwUlFCy7aicOcroIFLRkh6QrbZ1i0NTnt/AKU1a3/J+iNVhhyW60yp89Rfxpj48 8wGYcWkAwKCmsbg2Xfrlh+VEr7MP+7a+cPtYDoUJeqoq5+HGI4BOxwYwM77/uwqwa7G51z mZ2PCcnqzaK3deMb+shEKD5ZYuCvF16wokfc0EQ8gakPacURfPCGTx736QpwQqzU8yJigJ mLEPy/q9+iLgoH7mzRIZL89LfZ/SetfOj4gmi4sEtwsB4E09qWnF0+Qd0ZYdVg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D586673F03 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 16:55:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smDsy-0000uj-NP; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:55:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smDsw-0000oR-NW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:54:58 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smDsw-0007GU-Co for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:54:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=MljfRCtMSyFvFfV/2kflVplFTymKuAYFZCEOuyQma1o=; b=edJQB3fGhsGZDZdX3Vkgkgo4QwDg8UPirJjIdpxdbTjrfNz5b20q3LE31HDspnyTRtJL/0+DPilsZF2Ldwz6vblnkED6yVQQe1sXvcBj5m6VQ5OyqR3usnwSLNJ0489rypz+qN7fapUKIpta15NZy4fHV3bheX/oKO+VsBU4PwR2U4zUf8XrzKitxnsAsLHh5A3at/NlvBaecHcKqLzUKnC0vdjjCiFsWV4P6DMJfVnwETrYMzPwadPw3oqWiavohOK2KK2w43BRfagl4lFh43qSpXLx82+HUHjPPLgNgnE9LgXpQZN137Wuy6nXe/xy8ELPCXAu/AmEM80ZyI2EIg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smDtz-0007vV-G2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:56:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#72877] [PATCH 0/8] Upgrade PETSc, SLEPc, SUNDIALS, and DealII Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 14:56:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 72877 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Eric Bavier Cc: 72877-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Enge , Sharlatan Hellseher Received: via spool by 72877-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D72877.172554811230296 (code D ref 72877); Thu, 05 Sep 2024 14:56:03 +0000 Received: (at 72877-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2024 14:55:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smDt9-0007sW-9I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:55:12 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:14584) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smDgK-0006zL-M1 for 72877-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:42:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MljfRCtMSyFvFfV/2kflVplFTymKuAYFZCEOuyQma1o=; b=Ci7BrBQJD4tvbtbZ/1mQ0YGJtZp2DnoARdO06pe9BthxsZ/wAlGmsAgY nsDeX8k2Bel57xvT7CK+4jC4KFIBR84PjErGQsxO6X+VNrabhl+M0GzIe XENhX58oUN1br7VtuNhOpxgtC1jhiCRoDt/REq/fWe6Moe3Lpb21BcsN2 w=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,205,1719871200"; d="scan'208";a="181710203" Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net (HELO ribbon) ([91.160.117.201]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2024 16:40:45 +0200 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <692205d6c164d7e3e339068c65a43db4@posteo.net> (Eric Bavier's message of "Thu, 05 Sep 2024 13:07:25 +0000") References: <87seue8qg8.fsf@gnu.org> <692205d6c164d7e3e339068c65a43db4@posteo.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: =?UTF-8?Q?D=C3=A9cadi?= 20 Fructidor an 232 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de la Hotte X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 16:40:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5gm6u4z.fsf@inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -5.72 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D586673F03 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.72 X-TUID: P8e1TNgSA7wE Hi Eric, Thanks for taking the time to look into it. (I rushed the patch series more than usual because the whole stack was broken since the =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 merge.) Eric Bavier skribis: > I finally got a chance to look through it just before you pushed. My > only > note is that I noticed this in the output of petsc's "check" phase: > > # ------------- > # Summary > # ------------- > # FAILED vec_pf_impls_string_tests-ex1_1 diff-snes_tutorials-ex78_2 > # success 5721/10154 tests (56.3%) > # failed 2/10154 tests (0.0%) > # todo 240/10154 tests (2.4%) > # skip 4191/10154 tests (41.3%) > > but the 'check' phase doesn't fail. I wonder if the `make check` > invocation does not return a failure code when the tests fail. These > test failures > in particular look mostly harmless, but maybe other more catastrophic > failures > might not be caught if `check` is not detecting failures. Oh. I was told in the meantime that we might want to use =E2=80=98make tes= t=E2=80=99 instead, so perhaps we should followup on this update with a switch to =E2=80=98make test=E2=80=99 and see if problems as shown above still appear: https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/issues/1634#note_2070200322 Ludo=E2=80=99.