From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id KE+SHgF5MGfhJgEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 09:12:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id KE+SHgF5MGfhJgEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:12:33 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=hEWINNmQ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1731229953; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Z7zuJFbnwFcEEYXqXx1Z/qT2N7TCwCxv0SLf3EcbUCiGwPylxZPz8R7u/aGAAvL0aMc+3h r/aTYGNWIMiAvOeprReXki4d3WHbzEwBHNMDmbwt8BRqZmThRWjBItZzeeyFEHfJCcXdp4 yGamPoQo32GhSj1j+v/EBXBeyV+Cy365aH0U/sBgCsPpCQcuZ+bbV1uSjGkeVwYYqlMfyB UndLZQxnIb2cdmUuxhqM+HTd4FTOiV2y9Qjv/u2jOgYh/74p0v1QgWoYytwpkKi9WHH+3N cKGwcKwKpB5Em7zZcSeAmGzptm8l0SKIhUUQ7SbnBom6FpgdH5B1pjFoOsf9GA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=hEWINNmQ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1731229953; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=kS530Somz06vhj6SOC1XhfeVs19SGhc3XuHvdz087lI=; b=g/GzEjay4oj7Pwwzx/UImZcXilRWMuy/g/+c1hA2Ngw1NYpc5bXiulUxfy+1iU3wYrUeMo FXURxph6fp7bkrXkbZjd1pfofqzJtxvt8zxSQh6wG2wx3XABgkdzywBZH1Md+mgjhfIDfI O/D10k7CdXzV6cCUFuD5edQoYCmcfbvDq6Fglxdrw1y/VmM9jbwaXXysrjetegTwnkiEDK gffMPSOiunDWjpQ4ab8IUWhztUZ1hXvn6ijkNGRO57s3HBkc8Mop0zaQGUbb2IJMalS/mn uYoOpNhwCbwV7cYDbpT2SEfex4W7eyfljtkyQy07fPBw64tPGzDy9H1kbMLD6A== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9291F44C for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:12:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA3z4-0006XV-G3; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 04:11:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA3z2-0006XE-EC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 04:11:48 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA3z0-0008Rk-Ts for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 04:11:48 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-720d14c8dbfso3464018b3a.0 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 01:11:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1731229904; x=1731834704; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=kS530Somz06vhj6SOC1XhfeVs19SGhc3XuHvdz087lI=; b=hEWINNmQ6omi86H9/M3f0irt65tLohK7pAllUK0nmNt22J0qXVjzHsVUWzxCtcvDYe vjk/WBOtmgLTMNXp556S77s0Iu/7J4TRofktDtbLwJOPtuZZyf/2N2mZj7Y5v8HZzeIW Sn6f1hBWO4vypheI01L2EzbrnznEGtGvT14GYonSgmg2g/JU0hBtFIsCry9egcDvoqeE pZJ+nTJOIElddoK1bzMEZJUNsmN46WhvVUsBkIcbRNp0fVc4Rg+DleKxEXJNBMxjkA5N 0sPrP4+Ot8cNOdlLwS+sjKE4h9xyBxTKUozrbnmFYD+x5oTSTL2QzPG7NUQ0texYwo0y lDkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731229904; x=1731834704; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kS530Somz06vhj6SOC1XhfeVs19SGhc3XuHvdz087lI=; b=LqVGQvoPK3R9G88GmuCBEbo76VP1xwuu6iF4mkEdlhTjeg/ZlprjgrUznjXDNZaNql IGtykHvs0B/EhVzIGPP22qtby5pGOnxcY25tBOCjG1/GZWgy8bAH3Tb2jIli3qMQLmUS 8kY/HSVQfmc2MH78WH74AY21ARn9T4zX86k6iAKaacxLq+Z6UZa8lmMx+qjCMYzy+WJX PGAb16Hvi63wYid0z+p1A3h0pSbV6t1lNg0JfWmOoiQAZobrWOiuIXGsKilG8W5TgUcK XEIUfVCBUsnzwNID2DkGjp/Mz2q5r+pMCwkSqRuFGkxOo9UZkojENPeD/IzMKgVl47w9 YlmA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVnYudaW4Fo7YzLhvUlMSTWBqsAoLzRScbc61spB1Fm9d95ITXEACwYKPDbKCUpm7yyi1jzaMJHV10F@gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzGhmexpP1RrK4gI5Z26GlWgDv09r0snSvOB2IkMAjyA4ajsKmz UknUehkBIEr+MjYy/jb6HmeqB2rz6CzeDBbOKxu8SsrlXgaKQEui X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFb3x/8kPtPKq/APeCVpMeXYsg1g/5w2dT187uT9ISWxxLqrl6l1+DHqoXOuflh445EogVeBw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:3a14:b0:71e:6a57:7290 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-72413133f3bmr13263095b3a.0.1731229904272; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 01:11:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:c8ff:1707:9b9:af89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-724078a7de1sm7001940b3a.62.2024.11.10.01.11.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 10 Nov 2024 01:11:43 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Simon Tournier Cc: Hilton Chain , Jakob Kirsch , Guix Devel , 74112-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 74204-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#74204: [bug#74112] Guix is not reproducible In-Reply-To: <87pln70w16.fsf@gmail.com> (Simon Tournier's message of "Thu, 07 Nov 2024 18:54:29 +0100") References: <87fro6yntj.wl-hako@ultrarare.space> <87ed3pzora.wl-hako@ultrarare.space> <87pln70w16.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 18:11:38 +0900 Message-ID: <87a5e7xxkl.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-x42c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.89 X-Spam-Score: -3.89 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4C9291F44C X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: 8RkkX6DTMaLO Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 at 23:25, Hilton Chain via Bug reports for GNU Guix <= bug-guix@gnu.org> wrote: > >>> I can confirm the reproducibility issue. >>> >>> I have two x86_64-linux machines building guix to verify the fix, I'll = apply >>> your patch once they produce matching outputs. >> >> Took me quite a while to build 5 rounds. :) >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> $ guix hash --serializer=3Dnar /gnu/store/fs7x07jfn7igpkwv3alrs9by21q70y= 13-guix-1.4.0-26.5ab3c4c >> 0kh87wb4qn97kwzrf4igal71cjvv143j6jr2y3dwfzcy1madj1ll >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> Applied #74112 as 4c56d0cccdc44e12484b26332715f54768738c5f, thanks! > > Maybe I am missing something. To my knowledge, .go files produced by > Guile are not always reproducible, see bug#20272 [1]. And, from my > understanding, Guix cannot be reproducible until this bug had been > fixed. Therefore, I am not convinced that this patch is worth under > this frame considering the build-time penalty it brings. > > That=E2=80=99s said, maybe it=E2=80=99s better than nothing and the packa= ge =E2=80=99guix=E2=80=99 is > barely built after all. I do not know. > > What people think? Perhaps we should set the default parallel-build? to #f in the guile-build-system at least in the meantime, with a prominent comment as to why and a reference to the upstream issue? Many Guile packages use the gnu-build-system so that wouldn't cover all of them like 'guix'... I'm not sure. It'd be nicer to fix the underlying guile issue (again?), but I doubt many people are up to this. --=20 Thanks, Maxim