From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Distro name
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:37:04 +0100
Message-ID: <878v8a72pb.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87zk0r8nv4.fsf@gnu.org> <201301022342.40618.andreas@enge.fr>
	<87txqz6w29.fsf@gnu.org> <201301030945.04905.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47893)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Tqlux-0004gQ-Rq
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:37:16 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Tqlut-0001gG-41
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:37:11 -0500
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:59420)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1Tqlus-0001gA-U1
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:37:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201301030945.04905.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:45:02 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Hi!

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:
>> You mean (guix packages ...) or (packages ...)?  The latter seems like a
>> bad idea, because it could collide with something else, and it=E2=80=99s=
 not
>> sufficiently descriptive (it could be confused with Guile=E2=80=99s guil=
dhall
>> packaging system, for instance.)
>
> Maybe guixpackages? I just noticed that the "distro" directory only=20
> contains a subdirectory "packages", so thought this could be collapsed.

No, because eventually there=E2=80=99ll be (distro system ...) too=E2=80=93=
the
equivalent of what NixOS is to Nixpkgs, if you see what i mean.

Ludo=E2=80=99.