From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Karetnikov Subject: Re: Porting to mips64el Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:59:19 -0500 Message-ID: <878v7b8xc0.fsf@karetnikov.org> References: <8738yvnslh.fsf@karetnikov.org> <876232w1yg.fsf@gnu.org> <87txqmnkav.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87hamkst8o.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5fp2k37.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87k3r9ysl7.fsf@gnu.org> <87bockcnj8.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87bocjvs8m.fsf@gnu.org> <87libkygp3.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87libktruu.fsf@karetnikov.org> <877gn3zzcy.fsf@gnu.org> <87fw1rblhh.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87ham6o9rb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjzwv9z9.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87fw1nd3s8.fsf@gnu.org> <87libf41oo.fsf@karetnikov.org> <877gmy2uqc.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjztdfdr.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87boc9ea4a.fsf@gnu.org> <87mwvr3m94.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87vcafk8ln.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0JD5-0006o7-PW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:59:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0JD2-0000of-8p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:59:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87vcafk8ln.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "(unknown date)") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > The obvious thing to do here is to check whether that binary works > correctly. It=E2=80=99s supposed to be the statically-linked bootstrap B= ash, > see base.scm. The files are there. But if I try '/nix/store/qn*-glibc-intermediate-2.17/bin/sh --help', I'll get 'No such file or directory'. > This is tricky. You could try to restart the daemon with /bin and > anything else needed added to the chroot, and keep building from there, > hoping that there won=E2=80=99t be impurities again. Well, there are '/dev', '/proc', and '/bin'. Is it necessary to add something else? (I tried again and got the same error.) Nikita --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRCEZXAAoJEM+IQzI9IQ38PvIP/1hI4ttZvzvybysBuk0UR59v Cf149co1oEw37qp2HeSJ7/k6sOTUX2Q256mVsV1o1mVDiBf2q4qv9ADvknv1YO2Y KDSxUC5uSzkpYI9EmcTvwuA3EgflS8QDc4VkT34nunJWRpm2XCM4kJJywPHM82e6 GQl9XbL/WOcHxU9VolWkgBiFs4jNdwSoZnmScFcjEsmWTSCCyTjd/fBGU4O0arvS bwoc5M3yfAoQWXKcC5ll7u0EfQeVkwYuZIWZOpZzo0gRdMEyADkaT9ceYGlMpQ5w Sl0Mg9DOivMqFVFDMZXNUqZdzzBmfQrqUfjxacuoTq5R/MaDYL0tby8uiuk4kGuk SCp7F3yFQcxYwzTtlyVBIjbaE4gU+DheTyYuae3sPR5vBjfA0xDRWQMgqMF5saID XptMEZK0GCjYepKw1AkvVqi6p4mEkjnJBxOZmk2ZE550dauj8IAavfeldNFtpOFV nuL1u79uvw1wVWkE7bGWurht34W0ADeONniDTJLqnvf+HFEc2Q6cjp98zv82pj1o 9Z5WUpeMLLou+90gat1NCp4irkRZQR/IxbqDwaUXojjSgYH4bhnEQSUElyFddi9r M/w7ROqWnMcfykydS41MiiibHr65EqZCq/6gDpHOQsQMiMJNOVp4gMj0LNBRI6rm pYdPa5/6gNiXGEE1poSZ =Bxvo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--