From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add 'guix hash'.
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:21:33 +0400
Message-ID: <878v4qefua.fsf@karetnikov.org>
References: <87li92alhe.fsf@karetnikov.org> <874nforp12.fsf@gnu.org>
	<8762015b0w.fsf@karetnikov.org> <871uap5ak8.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<87zjxdvtqp.fsf@gnu.org> <8738uy7gim.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<87k3oa1tzd.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35963)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nikita@karetnikov.org>) id 1UPtzO-0008Qf-Ar
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:19:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nikita@karetnikov.org>) id 1UPtzL-0006Ux-Du
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:18:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k3oa1tzd.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
	=?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:54:30 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

--=-=-=

>> I guess that "wrong number of arguments" can be handled by
>> (lambda args ...).  Still, the above feels much safer.

> Not sure what you mean, but the above snippet is OK.

I thought that it's possible to remove 'match' and get the "wrong number
of arguments" from (strerror ...).  But now I'm not sure.  "wrong number
of arguments" should be handled by 'wrong-number-of-args', not
'system-error'.  So I'll use the proposed version.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRZVlRAAoJEM+IQzI9IQ385aMQAJEwhaYG04DcCr5QRALVYe9U
NpR3Kiw+uWReVcjyBiPpCAfT9zxpS7uEITrHwRein1Qun6XGZdvaqcXWbB0D9GNB
2PbAYiYOnawlvDByWLcCPNn5Mz58ZANLHYRSgzPrIp8n8K9zgBmTGF0LIrsP75w5
SjntobFs0dVQa/0KH7MaKTg8dy/bCPzEKHgEsqR/ltKx5cxiIGbAMVC9VcRl4EmU
tyA10P8+3msqYXo6oNVB0dkNz7OlYgiQgBvZ8wBdLN+3mS0PqRrj+RjE4wxiJYF5
zZ1D3Grts28UYsAU6Wj7vZLET3P0LW9zoJfH+COTlcZViVLxdVBpBRds2BKKjGUF
nTw/IdgR5vk10sAer2cbXBg4qsr4XfO9BINLaT5nOl0HodAJrr0WU2DZcsYbkndK
L3MSILxfY/kijXAziktGc5lLsnzjSFjgzpmr5yKk2dUQo/8o5xoFkWDYnrt2jUU8
W6NOnU1j2OoLfxz/2oAuptXEEORrUA4V9q0OCuIffFHYUmX/X44ji3ap8XIxv6wn
+ZqLG/zCowArrDJJ3ipF4QzndOVMaSSobk2pqaJwS/00UOSXeVjMRjlAjykD/IxR
gXkK92rr9j2b3ZkKB+0gnqyuqZheh7PL7lj5j+YU/vCM79ihZs8/LJBMQxoq59GL
n/dLOxS1ucf9Azj8dUKT
=jEax
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--