From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add wmctrl.
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 22:42:25 +0300
Message-ID: <878uiko99a.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87oaridzoj.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4qk27at.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42183)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1XxLFV-0006fB-Fw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:42:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1XxLFL-0004Pw-Gw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:42:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87y4qk27at.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 06 Dec 2014 15:15:38 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2014-12-06 17:15 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:

[...]
>> - Is it ok to make "wmctrl.scm" or would it be more appropriate to put
>>   it into "xdisorg.scm"?
>
> xdisorg.scm would seem preferable to me.

OK, then I think "unclutter" should go there as well.  What about "scrot"?

>> +  gnu/packages/patches/wmctrl-64-fix.patch
>
> Missing backslash.

Ouch, it was missed somehow.

>> +    (synopsis "Command-line tool to control X Window Manager")
>
> =E2=80=9Cto control X11 window managers=E2=80=9D
>
>> +    (description
>> +     "Wmctrl allows to interact with an X Window Manager that is compat=
ible
>> +with the EWMH/NetWM specification.  It can query the Window Manager for
>
> =E2=80=9Cwindow manager=E2=80=9D (lower case.)

Thanks, I'll fix the case.

> OK to push with these adjustments.

I have not committed yet: I have a concern that "wmctrl" will bring a
dependency on (gnu packages glib) to =E2=80=9Cxdisorg.scm=E2=80=9D.  Would =
it be a
problem?  However I see that xdisorg uses (gnu packages xorg) and xorg
uses (gnu packages xdisorg), so probably not.

--=20
Alex