From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: .dir-locals.el vs. guix-devel-mode
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 20:25:28 +0300
Message-ID: <878u7lxjw7.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <871tdm6i0i.fsf@gmail.com> <8737y28fss.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d1x57yhg.fsf@gmail.com> <87si5zwqqu.fsf@gnu.org>
	<878u7qybjn.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87r3lhxchs.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d1wyqoqw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wpv6l1d8.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87h9m9xwsf.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8s1e8mg.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53663)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1Zi45J-0003U2-R9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:25:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1Zi45G-0000E8-NX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:25:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a8s1e8mg.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:51:35 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2015-10-02 15:51 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
[...]
>> I thought that most people (except me) agreed that indentation rules
>> should stay in ".dir-locals.el", so I don't see a reason why they also
>> need to be duplicated in "guix-devel.el".
>
> It=E2=80=99s interesting to have them in .dir-locals.el for people who ha=
ck Guix
> itself.
>
> But it=E2=80=99s also interesting to have them in guix-devel.el for peopl=
e who
> maintain, say, their own package collection outside of the Guix repo.
>
> Does that make sense?

Oh, yes, now it does, thanks for the explanation!  I'll sent the patch
soon.

--=20
Alex