From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher W Carpenter Subject: bug#22571: Acknowledgement (Guix on Debian Testing sbcl package needs warning to set SBCL_HOME) Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:57:11 -0600 Message-ID: <878u2tpbt4.fsf@mordocai.net> References: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59805) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK2h-00018z-Of for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:58:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK2c-0003gc-MB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:58:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK2c-0003gM-Ds for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:58:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK2c-0007BM-3v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:58:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (GNU bug Tracking System's message of "Sat, 06 Feb 2016 05:45:02 +0000") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: 22571@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I found the problem, and this can be closed IMHO. I use StumpWM, which is written in common lisp and I use sbcl to run it. It appears that when the stumpwm image is created the SBCL_HOME environment variable's state at that time is stored. In addition, for whatever reason, any processes started from stumpwm will have a SBCL_HOME environment variable with that same value. Therefore, my issue was that my stumpwm that was starting my processes(and the processess themselves) had an old, incorrect value for SBCL_HOME which would then cause this error. Interesting "bug" to find! Thanks for the help! Christopher Carpenter --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWupj3AAoJEFJw6mniKuelQp4P/0ZazgFu9smWrUWEwoUZghXC 1CBbHRSOevS4BRlTt/IEPcWl93lEHcjmpmGfq20ynQMw1q1oL2yK1wydZ+7gWcHL sYiRLA2gt1k5ksuTCryT9wrtskTG6OSoLOq5gWj3eI7bC8QPyi2qt40RuHNcMxch RD152Ku1iFXjbZV8AL4H2AVvEwiQ7F5jgt55omYnqo3+KI82kdtkjodqb/LciSIj bFkQFDj0jsS0r19diyIQ1OQnX0FA7gVuYoa7cb3lXiLzxhRFj4BxF6sI7ckyYyID ZSyZkfX0xnPaljg9Fhm6h/DBuXJfNW0GwuA/iisOoLgPjqF/8GEPpAu6RLWkp8bc pqLDu61f30Rus8VassBnbkBDcw0x4zPvDQf09ClOBrcCDWI5v2sZIsgmFXIeaSBk g01NTcx729XrJqfVCgpuFbNrZtS6TuMVsk+uoGpfrPcZ0kQZ5nre0FnDYe5BEpS7 K3aoCnMYU61F2ifLHmrIXU6spal0cvu9SjPGA8S1Z9cPWgPPFOxJVGTLYEq0l7qJ ZoXQofX9PWMhdt4Q+VFmZTLTzKw6U5bfhLfEnE8CvLfi6iwvrF6Kw6NoTuYgOJ0Y EJSU5j8+LfqfWq61tjY42aBwe9rw/nxjAR0Gw89YXCkZyhFh1isXz/Fq3ZRhxVCV JpWP7ExGH9cg2bLPL684 =rsLZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--