From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Update btrfs-progs once again and add static output Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:30:18 +0200 Message-ID: <878u0gnof9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1459603774-9455-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <20160412000709.GB11228@jasmine> <20160412071344.GA15113@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqkAI-0002by-5x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:30:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqkAE-0006Kr-IQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:30:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160412071344.GA15113@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2016 03:13:44 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:07:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 03:29:31PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> > Some simple patches to add a =E2=80=98static=E2=80=99 output to the bt= rfs-progs >> > package, containing statically linked versions of all the tools. >>=20 >> I've applied your patches (with some very minor edits to the commit >> messages), bringing HEAD to 5f3f3ac2874. > > I forgot to check how many packages would be rebuilt by the change to > util-linux: 714. > > Should I revert the change and put it on core-updates? That would have been the way to go, yes. However, at this point I think it=E2=80=99s too late to revert. Mark? Ludo=E2=80=99.