From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] gnu: mesa: Enable wayland support. Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:57:38 +0200 Message-ID: <878twkbifx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160709125011.24587-1-david@craven.ch> <20160718165552.1480-1-david@craven.ch> <20160718165552.1480-6-david@craven.ch> <87inw1e4oe.fsf@gnu.org> <878twvp4sp.fsf@gnu.org> <87zipbkmh9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42897) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bT9EQ-0003R5-TC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:57:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bT9EM-0001tH-JV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:57:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: (David Craven's message of "Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:28:17 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel David Craven skribis: > So is this going into the main mesa package? Or should I submit a > mesa-wayland package instead? (Please keep a bit of context when replying.) In my last message I gave you the main criterion for deciding whether to add Wayland support in Mesa so that you could decide whether to it was worthy: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-07/msg00840.html What did =E2=80=98guix size=E2=80=99 reveal, and what does it suggest? :-) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.