From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: dmidecode: Update to 3.0. Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:45:23 -0400 Message-ID: <878twgsdbg.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87poptbqnx.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87bn1dwqqg.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <874m75k265.fsf_-_@openmailbox.org> <877fc1woot.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87y44hijqw.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87bn1cd4mt.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUFPO-0005AX-G7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:45:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUFPI-0003lO-Tx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:45:37 -0400 Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:48047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUFPI-0003lI-Hf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:45:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bn1cd4mt.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is's message of "Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:02:02 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain ng0 writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> ng0 writes: >> >>> Kei Kebreau writes: >>> >>>> ng0 writes: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Kei Kebreau writes: >>>>> >>>>>> A package for those who like to roam around the lower levels of their >>>>>> machines. As soon as this package is verified to build successfully and >>>>>> reproducibly on another user's machine, I can push it to the repos. >>> >>> snip >>> >>>> Wow! I must have misspelled dmidecode when I searched for it! Silly me. :-P >>>> >>>> I've attached a new patch. I don't know whether updating a version >>>> number necessitates a copyright assignment, so I omitted it. >>> >>> Thanks. No problem. I can not review it (or at least not right now), but >>> version bumps get copyright assignments too. >>> I think I could review it on tuesday or tomorrow night. Could you send >>> it as .patch in addition to inlined? I have not figured out how to >>> extract inlined patches in notmuch yet. >>> > > Weird, did you sent it as patch the first time already and not inlined? > I should really allow myself a vacation at some point. > I did indeed. You have my permission to take a break any time you like! :-) > Builds here, patch looks good to me. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXn26TAAoJEOal7jwZRnoNFdkP/AszOsXXDIC6lqQBRyHnbugS TWQbaxtKrV2i8zO263x8YONMGHm6C/2X8kDfe82Mje5/ZOxO6jO19ZYPgJfwS247 qaL147sY2jF1y26mbCLadwuWUDHzJCAEKcJNtIKtDWezq5tkhIh8UfcgBnhIORn1 WZTim01dPbArdltc6DVc5QA7w+gEFCfRAJP/NaMCpqQTCNaLhevh/lnbWXAxLddk bYZEWiKsAuEA2VqJ0eT5WXYllKUjFrdFDA4EmBWCsKiD1ziG/X+f/m153BJk8fKw RUl2yHV42V+OU+2Rb4HKI1m4gLr5JAwyfAwJPOb3uzMFA7hW7navWkn0tw83rehv l5FpsrntVCBWuuTvpiK4c9eTcoYXeOEwQZFAvnRN6eLjatDzq3Qdi1cx5wK//Br9 BhipsqOTGKvlo5DW6oY/pFZt1ca2IlPOAHnE9KFLiuxTi1rTKy5/kV0x2Pqgtan1 SEBcdkgz8qtrsVreRG5swQVmZdO/qYcUU/VZAJWSjWjcJOPB8yJ+FtU60SiQ71Ci O+SnUZZtsK1saA+6b3D1yDPFcAyDQA7Ql8A11oe4mG99WbC64/xb2pEP4YsRSraM irvSwTwlNSU07CrmUQzKl+tEoLeV3gzzE59BFJT7Tm13MPqaA5Gw6jkL3I7oCsMm mAn/asiQpBT5gaHFn6Dy =BNK5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--