From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: More duplicate package definitions Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:10:16 +0200 Message-ID: <878ttri3tz.fsf@elephly.net> References: <1476105003-29538-1-git-send-email-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <1476105003-29538-2-git-send-email-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <20161012221037.1179dde6@scratchpost.org> <57FF8982.6060403@crazy-compilers.com> <20161013223949.GB14481@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bv0Ng-0006Nz-7r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 07:10:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bv0Nb-0004Qm-5n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 07:10:28 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bv0Na-0004QO-TQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 07:10:23 -0400 In-reply-to: <20161013223949.GB14481@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:17:54PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: >> Hi Danny, >> >> thanks for pointing this out. >> > python2-msgpack has a duplicate too. >> >> I removed this one, too. >> >> > And so do ruby-arel, r-codetools, r-gtable. >> >> >> These have different versions and are not defined just below each other. >> Somebody else needs to work on this. > > We should CC whoever added those second patches to get their input. At > least, we can add comments to the package definitions to explain why we > need to keep multiple versions around. Looks like I added the “r-codetools” dupe. It’s the same version and it wasn’t on purpose, as far as I can tell. It’s okay to remove it. “r-gtable” seems to be the same. What’s weird is that I added both versions according to git blame, so maybe it’s been a careless merge? I’d suggest removing the older version. ~~ Ricardo