From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] gnu: Add openocd.
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:24:13 +0100
Message-ID: <878tt5k84y.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87h97xf19n.fsf@elephly.net>
	<20161028173606.31099-1-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org>
	<20161028173606.31099-4-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org>
	<CAL1_imm=SvHDcte-Y8cn3ggjYKhr1G1T0wbP+B_Y66JiZOz_fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k2cq9z8k.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59009)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1c0umP-0003gG-M7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:24:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1c0umM-0000HT-JQ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:24:25 -0400
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21351)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1c0umM-0000GB-Ay
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:24:22 -0400
In-reply-to: <87k2cq9z8k.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> David Craven <david@craven.ch> writes:
>
>> Hi Theodor,
>>
>> I made libjaylink and jimtcl two separate packages and a couple of
>> style changes.
>
> In that case we can use the tarball release of openocd, no?
>
> This would simplify the package as we would no longer need to
> bootstrap.  Could you please take care of this?

It looks like using the latest release won’t work because the patch
applies to master :-/

So I won’t be updating the source and fix just the license.

~~ Ricardo