From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add libfilezilla. Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:32:23 -0800 Message-ID: <878tpa4n48.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20170209163618.1759-1-rennes@openmailbox.org> <20170209163618.1759-3-rennes@openmailbox.org> <87tw7y4yh8.fsf@gmail.com> <3c7b4c5e7d26adfc4898e06aea82976b@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdABT-0003Ps-1k for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 01:32:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdABR-0007KS-Hr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 01:32:23 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::241]:34665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdABR-0007KJ-CI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 01:32:21 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-x241.google.com with SMTP id v184so9003396pgv.1 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:32:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3c7b4c5e7d26adfc4898e06aea82976b@openmailbox.org> (rennes@openmailbox.org's message of "Sun, 12 Feb 2017 20:41:07 -0600") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: rennes@openmailbox.org Cc: guix-devel Hi, rennes@openmailbox.org writes: > Hello Maxim, > > On 2017-02-12 20:26, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> Hi, >> > offering/offers/ or s/offering/provides/ >> >>> + (license gpl3+))) >> >> Only license information I could find is the COPYING file which is >> GPLv2. I think gpl2+ would be more appropriate. >> > > grepping libfilezilla directory, i see glp2 and gpl3: > > libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/depcomp:# the Free Software Foundation; > either version 2, or (at your option) > libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/compile:# the Free Software Foundation; > either version 2, or (at your option) > libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/missing:# the Free Software Foundation; > either version 2, or (at your option) > libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/config.guess:# the Free Software Foundation; > either version 3 of the License, or > libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/ltmain.sh:# the Free Software Foundation; > either version 2 of the License, or > libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/config.sub:# the Free Software Foundation; > either version 3 of the License, or I don't see this in the sources (https://svn.filezilla-project.org/filezilla/libfilezilla/tags/0.9.0/). I'm pretty sure those GPLv3 licensed files are part of the GNU autotools rather than libfilezilla. > libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/test-driver:# the Free Software Foundation; > either version 2, or (at your option) > libfilezilla-0.9.0/configure:# published by the Free Software > Foundation; either version 2 of > libfilezilla-0.9.0/COPYING: the Free Software Foundation; either > version 2 of the License, or > libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/ax_check_link_flag.m4:# Free Software > Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your > libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/ax_check_compile_flag.m4:# Free Software > Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your > libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/libtool.m4:# published by the Free Software > Foundation; either version 2 of > libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/ax_append_flag.m4:# Free Software Foundation, > either version 3 of the License, or (at your m4 is part of autotools, which is GPLv3. It's not part of the libfilezilla project. > libfilezilla-0.9.0/README:the Free Software Foundation; either version > 2 of the License, or > > Should I put both? > Thanks I still think gpl2+ is the most accurate if we want to stick to what upstream says. Maxim