From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:41:16 +0200
Message-ID: <878tkd43s3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170625235326.GA24268@jasmine.lan> <87zicv89fk.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170626183254.GA14748@jasmine.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48095)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dPwNC-00037q-WC
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:42:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dPwN8-0005Xv-2I
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:42:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38496)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dPwN7-0005Xa-Ve
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:42:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dPwN7-0007E8-MA
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:42:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27261.B27261.149859250727758@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170626183254.GA14748@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of
	"Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:32:54 -0400")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Leo,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> Could you check whether =E2=80=9Cguix package -A syncthing=E2=80=9D show=
s it there?  The
>> warning should appear as soon as we=E2=80=99re upgrading a package that=
=E2=80=99s
>> missing.
>
> I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix package -A syncthing`
> from the repo where I removed qsyncthingtray.

So does =E2=80=9C./pre-inst-env guix package -u syncthing=E2=80=9D raise a =
warning?
It should.

> `guix package -A syncthing` shows a result for qsyncthingtray, because
> that is a "plain" Guix, from `guix pull`, set up as described in Binary
> Installation:
>
> $ ls -l $(which guix)
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 54 Aug 14  2015 /usr/local/bin/guix -> /var/guix/=
profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix
> $ ls -l ~/.config/guix/latest=20
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 leo leo 55 Jun 25 19:19 /home/leo/.config/guix/latest -> /gn=
u/store/jbrn4pixmrqmqk8jmx533cnqhjhm17sb-guix-latest
>
> But, that's not the Guix that I expect to be queried for packages. Maybe
> there is some unexpected interaction between the various copies of Guix?

I don=E2=80=99t think so.  But maybe I=E2=80=99m missing something!

Ludo=E2=80=99.