From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#19811: Attempt to graft texlive times out after one hour Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:26:17 +0200 Message-ID: <878tg7oaxy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8761bd2moy.fsf@netris.org> <87egq10z1q.fsf@netris.org> <87si466ppx.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv4o2ez0.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35943) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e55ER-0006C7-BS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:27:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e55EM-0006HA-HF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:27:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e55EM-0006Gh-Ea for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e55EM-0002FK-9Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:27:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87mv4o2ez0.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:50:11 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 19811-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> I was able to do it by passing "--max-silent-time=3D36000". It ended up >>> taking just under 2 hours (real time) to graft texlive on my i686 >>> Libreboot X60 system. >> >> With commit 333c376 it may be down to one hour if there are two cores. >> Still way too much for something like TeX Live, but an improvement. > > Is this still an issue? While grafting the texlive package is still > rather slow I haven=E2=80=99t seen anything close to one hour recently. Same here. Grafting big packages is still rather slow as you write, but we shouldn=E2=80=99t have anything as big as the old monolithic texlive pac= kage (4=C2=A0GiB!). > Can this bug be closed? I think so. Done! Ludo=E2=80=99.