From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45869)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eL4dX-0008Mq-CB
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 05:03:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eL4dU-0003XP-9Q
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 05:03:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60554)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eL4dU-0003XL-6C
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 05:03:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eL4dS-00015n-7T
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 05:03:03 -0500
Subject: [bug#29480] [PATCH] gnu: Add xautolock.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.29480.D29480.15122089314140@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <87zi7786b0.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3mn3jec.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87indq0xhw.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 11:02:06 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87indq0xhw.fsf@gnu.org> (Mike Gerwitz's message of "Fri, 01 Dec
	2017 19:44:27 -0500")
Message-ID: <878tel30td.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org>
Cc: 29480-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi,

Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org> skribis:

> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 15:56:11 +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> I took the liberty to make the changes below:
>
> Ah, thanks!
>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm
>> -               (zero? (system* "xmkmf"))
>> +               (invoke "xmkmf")
>
> Okay, that makes much more sense.  I was wondering if `zero?' had some
> special meaning in that context.

=E2=80=98zero?=E2=80=99 returns a Boolean and in this case it was ignored.

> gnu/packages/xfig.scm:93 uses it in a non-tail position as well.  I
> looked at the history for the file but it was always like that;
> perhaps that should be `invoke' too?

I guess we should!  I=E2=80=99ve made the change and will push soonish.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.