From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#29522: rustc-1.16.0 broken after jemalloc updated to 5.0.1
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:19:32 +0100
Message-ID: <878teimmvv.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87h8tb4cf1.fsf@vany.ca>
	<CAPsKtf+A0cH3GhGtNgz8309odVVdsAUPC78PmZBiBD8xyKFuOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<878teirh99.fsf@gnu.org> <87d13uxyn1.fsf@vany.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41629)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eLuPV-00078z-Ot
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:20:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eLuPS-0001lA-Hs
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:20:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37074)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eLuPS-0001l4-EA
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:20:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eLuPS-0006At-7h
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:20:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.29522.B29522.151240797623694@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87d13uxyn1.fsf@vany.ca> (Adam Van Ymeren's message of "Mon, 04
	Dec 2017 11:10:10 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Adam Van Ymeren <adam@vany.ca>
Cc: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>, 29522@debbugs.gnu.org

Adam Van Ymeren <adam@vany.ca> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org> skribis:

[...]

>>> It seems that the bundled copy of jemalloc in the rustc repo is current=
ly
>>> pinned at 4.5.0 partially
>>> because of this specific issue as well.
>>>
>>> I did find an issue on the rust GH repo [0], and it seems this also aff=
ects
>>> the nix-rust project,
>>> who seem to have the same errors as our currently failing build [1].
>>>
>>> A temporary workaround could be to have a custom version of jemalloc wi=
th
>>> the c++ features disabled
>>> by building with `--disable-cxx'. Alternatively, we could just make use=
 of
>>> jemalloc 4.5.0 for rustc only
>>> until this is all sorted our by upstream.
>>
>> Using a --disable-cxx variant of the latest jemalloc sounds preferable
>> to me over running an old jemalloc.
>
> I feel like if rust is pegged at jemalloc 4.5.0 then that's what we
> should be feeding it.  The changelog suggestst that jemalloc 5 has some
> pretty significant changes, changing rust to use that theoretically lead
> to some subtle bugs, I feel like I'd rather wait for upstream to make
> the upgrade themselves.

Right, that makes sense.

In that case, we should reintroduce jemalloc 4.5 and use that in Rust.

Ludo=E2=80=99.