From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: bug#30265: Fish shell has wrong path variables Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 18:19:29 +0000 Message-ID: <878tcjjham.fsf@abyayala.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87inbnpsx9.fsf@gmail.com> <87shar8u6d.fsf@abyayala.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87bmhf1d7k.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1efV5C-0001cF-IZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:20:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1efV58-00085b-JG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:20:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37587) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1efV58-00085O-Eg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:20:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1efV58-0001zc-4U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:20:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87bmhf1d7k.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Sat, 27 Jan 2018 17:25:03 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 30265@debbugs.gnu.org On Sat, 27 Jan 2018, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Hi ng0 and Meiyo, > > ng0@n0.is skribis: > >> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018, Meiyo Peng wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am using GuixSD 0.14. After upgrading fish shell to latest version(v2.7.1) and >>> running `guix gc`, fish shell does not work well. >> >> Can you explain a bit more about your setup? I assume you use >> fish as you user shell and not just as a shell you switch into >> from a Bash enabled user, correct? > > Note that the current ‘guix’ package, 0.14.0-7.33988f9, includes Fish > completion support, which was not the case before: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ ls -R $(guix build guix)/share/fish > /gnu/store/apji9j8cwf9xpd5jk5mk8s6r1a391yvq-guix-0.14.0-7.33988f9/share/fish: > vendor_completions.d > > /gnu/store/apji9j8cwf9xpd5jk5mk8s6r1a391yvq-guix-0.14.0-7.33988f9/share/fish/vendor_completions.d: > guix.fish > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Could it be the reason why you’re having problems now that you didn’t > experience earlier? > > Any ideas, ng0? > > Thanks, > Ludo’. > > > > No, I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with adding fish support to Guix. -- ng0 :: https://ea.n0.is A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 :: https://ea.n0.is/keys/