From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#28144: bug#31294: Failed building dependencies for guix.
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 15:35:21 +0200
Message-ID: <878t93sdly.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <BLUPR16MB05006CCADC9B1E67C28BCF65928C0@BLUPR16MB0500.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
	<87vaca578z.fsf@gnu.org>
	<BLUPR16MB05002D49B4A0E83B5F5FF4DD92820@BLUPR16MB0500.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
	<87po2hyozt.fsf@gnu.org>
	<BLUPR16MB0500BA35BBAD09BFB6A735A192820@BLUPR16MB0500.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
	<87po2gtn82.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40666)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fDVRt-0008FB-8j
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 09:36:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fDVRq-00083d-64
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 09:36:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36936)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1fDVRq-00083F-22
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 09:36:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fDVRp-0007BV-MS
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 09:36:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28144.B28144.152518172827568@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87po2gtn82.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:10:05 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Fis Trivial <ybbs.daans@hotmail.com>
Cc: 28144@debbugs.gnu.org, "31294@debbugs.gnu.org" <31294@debbugs.gnu.org>

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis:

> It confirms that the bad code creates a <gexp> structure with the empty
> list as its =E2=80=98modules=E2=80=99 field instead of '((guix build util=
s)).
>
> That=E2=80=99s clearly a Guile bug.

This miscompilation issue involves =E2=80=9Csyntax parameters=E2=80=9D (bec=
ause
=E2=80=98with-imported-modules=E2=80=99 uses a syntax parameter), and it ve=
ry likely has
to do with the thread-safety issue I describe here:
<https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D27476#74>.

Ludo=E2=80=99.