From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58631) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFj5T-0005ZV-Sq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 12:34:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFj5Q-00083N-PU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 12:34:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFj5Q-00083G-Mg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 12:34:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fFj5O-00046t-Hm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 12:34:04 -0400 Subject: [bug#31036] [PATCH] gnu: Add Emacs dumb-jump Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <20180403023403.GA4430@sam> <29a411b7.AL4AAAOBQdEAAAAAAAAAAAO0oB8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABaw7s5@mailjet.com> <20180409150008.GA10060@sam> <70DDB0B3-87D6-441A-AF01-FF245C3B6C9A@gmail.com> <20180411025055.GA21656@sam> <20180412065009.GA7920@sam> <87h8nm54ge.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 19:33:42 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Arun Isaac's message of "Sun, 06 May 2018 14:37:57 +0530") Message-ID: <878t8v2zo9.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 31036@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Arun Isaac writes: > Oleg Pykhalov writes: [=E2=80=A6] >> I probably should remove my =E2=80=98emacs-dumb-jump=E2=80=99. Is it OK= for you? > > Sure, please go ahead and remove one of the duplicate packages. I > believe the version I pushed is a little more complete with > native-inputs and tests (though I couldn't get them working properly). OK, I've reverted an older package recipe in 8c58640d179a26a1a4cde3d8920bd928edb84d1c Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlrwf+YACgkQckbhHGm3 lWkggw//bpolZGZlmecNQkyxlH28rZRU2B5V59jgS2uW/V3qY67U84MUfiA+jkxD J+ZldWCQkgtjLPteaLrVCq16vcMfvWEfW1wDVBOAyC6jOzCiGNvbaylrHI7Db/bj CR+m+DB5185uCm3k8i7l+pLubPoOYFFxy3gN3gQzGMuC9UPp2HJl7eqZbbryLFS0 SV/U1QHt7PzAi3eWkAC0gjiZ46rZWNnP8CHDlvCfk1JA6DXHQ5v/n78EwJdXmkUU GxJ6DPpc7ZMqGiTqLaQmeY+ZmOLPaSRtP/uxV5UxSF1iuSk+QqgetubfKNcAmDY0 mYjp3wVy7f4rc/E1fnqaWjgbwzuQAmR1YRp+FSf9qTk/m/smeWzGjjazU7a5meBp FzgEhmWumGc96RIudPmI7cH/Qa6Un66E0xGha1tY9kBGaXIYQDWXjem8ZleosKs0 UZ27jKb7ea/6kGqjgybo5eSuKIcH3/ZRr/1yzbLEYeZiFuLcFJ5s6npv+cp9KuR2 /s5cvoWRKS9C8dloQGL3aRqgtzalXo5rmeWDkxtH4cwhM7i40+hDFZmki6TA7fpY Q669mA0uWYKxQIzQOzUDmVT4TAjALQRfcGx2fWdROfEBgQI4Ry/cwErcygtvnOea UTWkivzZ5VZwXna9FAvrhzfGPgOzJc9fcs8nP1m6tJ5vFrdHUhI= =6oo9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--