From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Controling requirements when packaging haskell modules Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 16:18:49 +0200 Message-ID: <878t8iz7p2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180511202202.5f142b12@merlin.browniehive.net> <87h8ndc73a.fsf@elephly.net> <87a7t2a8qo.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3gmlbzj.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJJk7-0002dW-Se for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 10:18:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJJk3-0000YV-5S for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 10:18:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y3gmlbzj.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Mon, 14 May 2018 13:20:48 +0200") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: "help-guix@gnu.org" Hello, Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >>> You should not package ghc-array, ghc-containers, or ghc-binary =E2=80= =94 these >>> are all provided by GHC itself. It is possible that there are some more >>> packages for which this applies (possibly including semigroupoids). >> >> Oops, I pushed ghc-array and ghc-containers just yesterday. Should I >> revert? > > Yes, these packages better should not exist. You can revert the commits > adding them and modify the package definitions of whatever new packages > refer to them. > > We removed them some time ago when we cleaned up and updated most of the > Haskell packages. Right. I=E2=80=99ve removed them again now, sorry for the mess. Ton, could you update your patch series at: https://bugs.gnu.org/31422 https://bugs.gnu.org/31423 ? TIA! Ludo=E2=80=99.