From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [outreachy] Further steps Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 07:58:20 +0200 Message-ID: <878t2l5jwj.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20181024071635.29543fcf@alma-ubu> <877ei67mfq.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFvqo-00082B-J5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 02:44:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFvql-0002Z6-Qz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 02:44:06 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFvql-0002Yg-Eo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 02:44:03 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Laura Lazzati Cc: Guix-devel , Ricardo Wurmus Hi Laura, > BTW, I was trying to run guix pull, the one installed on top of my > foreing distro - not the one in the guix environment - and I am > getting this error, don't know why, I have already run guix pull > before: > :~/guix$ guix pull > Migrating profile generations to '/var/guix/profiles/per-user/laura'... > guix pull: error: symlink: File exists: > "/var/guix/profiles/per-user/laura/current-guix-1-link" Could you please tell us what =E2=80=9Cguix --version=E2=80=9D says? This = might make it easier for us to tell you how to get around this problem. There was a recent change to the storage location of the profile used by =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D. It would previously be stored in the home dir= ectory and has now been changed to be stored where other profiles are stored. The error message seems to say that a migration to the new location had already happened, so it shouldn=E2=80=99t attempt to do this again. -- Ricardo