From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Guile text editor
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 18:22:52 +0100
Message-ID: <878t1d15hv.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <LSOpt2L--3-1@tutanota.com> <87muptlb7g.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<20181128110855.GC28059@macbook41>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32857)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gS3YC-0002PR-16
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:23:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gS3Y9-0007Vh-Tp
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:22:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20181128110855.GC28059@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of
	"Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:08:55 +0200")
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: Help Guix <help-guix@gnu.org>

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:59:15AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>> I suspect most Guix developers use Emacs with the Geiser mode for enhanc=
ed
>> Scheme integration.
>>=20
>> A segfault on "C-x u"? (you mean undo?)  Very strange.  Can you reproduc=
e a
>> specific recipe?  Is it just in Guile files?  What minor modes are you r=
unning?
>> Is it terminal or graphical Emacs?
>>=20
>> Note that if you have a US QWERTY layout, you might prefer "C-/" to undo.
>>=20
>
> I use vim with no highlighting. We also have edi as a code editor. I
> haven't tried it out too much though, or with guix.

I believe Vim provides syntax highlighting and autoidenting for Scheme,
as well as paredit.vim:

  https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Formatting-Code.html

Ludo=E2=80=99.