From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>, swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup.net>
Cc: 35588@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#35588: [PATCH] ui: Search matches additional package outputs., bug#35588: [PATCH] ui: Search matches additional package outputs.
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 23:50:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878svhv3re.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mujy8yd8.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 07 May 2019 10:25:39 +0200, Wed, 8 May 2019 00:24:39 +0200")
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3128 bytes --]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>> (match (field obj)
>> (#f relevance)
>> - (str (+ relevance
>> - (* (score str) weight)))))))
>> + ((? string? str) (+ relevance
>> + (* (score str) weight)))
>> + ((? list? lst) (+ relevance
>> + (* weight
>> + (apply + (map score lst)))))))))
>
> Nitpick: it’s a bit subjective, but I think this clause might be
> slightly nicer like this:
>
> ((lst ...)
> (+ relevance (* weight (reduce + 0 (map score lst)))))
Works for me! I've changed the match clause accordingly in the attached
patch.
swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup.net> writes:
> On 2019-05-07 02:57, Chris Marusich wrote:
>> + ;; Match against uncommon outputs.
>> + (,(lambda (package)
>> + (filter (lambda (output)
>> + (not (member output
>> + ;; Some common outpus shared by many packages.
>> + '("out" "debug" "doc" "static"))))
>
> I suggest we add "gui" and "lib" to this list.
Actually, I was curious about this, so I checked how many outputs are
being used by all our packages today. Here are the results:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guix-user)> ,use (gnu packages) (guix packages)
scheme@(guix-user)> (define (increment table key) (hash-set! table key (+ 1 (hash-ref table key 0))))
scheme@(guix-user)> (define (increment-outputs package table) (for-each (lambda (output) (increment table output)) (package-outputs package)) table)
scheme@(guix-user)> (define outputs-to-count (fold-packages increment-outputs (make-hash-table)))
scheme@(guix-user)> ,pp (sort (hash-map->list cons outputs-to-count) (lambda (a b) (< (cdr a) (cdr b))))
$1 = (("kernel-patch" . 1)
("pcf-8bit" . 1)
("python2" . 1)
("schema" . 1)
("octave" . 1)
("jp" . 1)
("db" . 1)
("gtk3" . 1)
("kr" . 1)
("subtree" . 1)
("pulseaudio" . 1)
("cn" . 1)
("ruby" . 1)
("fbgrab" . 1)
("credential-netrc" . 1)
("front-end" . 1)
("psf" . 1)
("tw" . 1)
("libedataserverui" . 1)
("gtk2" . 1)
("pcf" . 1)
("send-email" . 1)
("jack" . 1)
("python3" . 1)
("ndiff" . 1)
("installer" . 1)
("svn" . 1)
("image" . 1)
("tiles" . 2)
("fortran" . 3)
("include" . 3)
("utils" . 3)
("tests" . 3)
("python" . 4)
("tk" . 4)
("metis" . 4)
("gui" . 4)
("examples" . 5)
("jdk" . 6)
("bin" . 8)
("cargo" . 16)
("static" . 33)
("lib" . 38)
("debug" . 87)
("doc" . 134)
("out" . 9811))
scheme@(guix-user)>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
In light of that, I've chosen to exclude all of the following outputs:
'("out" "doc" "debug" "lib" "static" "bin" "examples" "gui" "tests"
"utils" "include")
I've also added a test to verify that package outputs are included in
search results.
What do you all think of this latest version?
--
Chris
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-ui-Make-package-outputs-searchable.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 5347 bytes --]
From dedea618bdd0d557e3e1183c403ff4e11d1757f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 01:51:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ui: Make package outputs searchable.
* guix/ui.scm (relevance): Allow the "field" procedure of a metric to
return a list, and handle that case appropriately. Update docstring.
(%package-metrics): Add a metric for package outputs.
* guix/scripts/package.scm (find-packages-by-description): Update
docstring.
* tests/guix-package.sh: Add a test case to verify that package outputs are
included in search results.
Co-authored-by: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
---
guix/scripts/package.scm | 6 +++---
guix/ui.scm | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
tests/guix-package.sh | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/guix/scripts/package.scm b/guix/scripts/package.scm
index aa27984ea2..06e4cf5b9c 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/package.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/package.scm
@@ -180,9 +180,9 @@ hooks\" run when building the profile."
;;;
(define (find-packages-by-description regexps)
- "Return two values: the list of packages whose name, synopsis, or
-description matches at least one of REGEXPS sorted by relevance, and the list
-of relevance scores."
+ "Return two values: the list of packages whose name, synopsis, description,
+or output matches at least one of REGEXPS sorted by relevance, and the list of
+relevance scores."
(let ((matches (fold-packages (lambda (package result)
(if (package-superseded package)
result
diff --git a/guix/ui.scm b/guix/ui.scm
index 92c845e944..8f95c00361 100644
--- a/guix/ui.scm
+++ b/guix/ui.scm
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
;;; Copyright © 2016 Benz Schenk <benz.schenk@uzh.ch>
;;; Copyright © 2018 Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
;;; Copyright © 2018 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
+;;; Copyright © 2019 Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
+;;; Copyright © 2019 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -1370,9 +1372,9 @@ WIDTH columns. EXTRA-FIELDS is a list of symbol/value pairs to emit."
(define (relevance obj regexps metrics)
"Compute a \"relevance score\" for OBJ as a function of its number of
matches of REGEXPS and accordingly to METRICS. METRICS is list of
-field/weight pairs, where FIELD is a procedure that returns a string
-describing OBJ, and WEIGHT is a positive integer denoting the weight of this
-field in the final score.
+field/weight pairs, where FIELD is a procedure that returns a string or list
+of strings describing OBJ, and WEIGHT is a positive integer denoting the
+weight of this field in the final score.
A score of zero means that OBJ does not match any of REGEXPS. The higher the
score, the more relevant OBJ is to REGEXPS."
@@ -1394,8 +1396,10 @@ score, the more relevant OBJ is to REGEXPS."
((field . weight)
(match (field obj)
(#f relevance)
- (str (+ relevance
- (* (score str) weight)))))))
+ ((? string? str)
+ (+ relevance (* (score str) weight)))
+ ((lst ...)
+ (+ relevance (* weight (apply + (map score lst)))))))))
0
metrics))
@@ -1404,6 +1408,17 @@ score, the more relevant OBJ is to REGEXPS."
;; of regexps.
`((,package-name . 4)
+ ;; Match against uncommon outputs.
+ (,(lambda (package)
+ (filter (lambda (output)
+ (not (member output
+ ;; Some common outpus shared by many packages.
+ '("out" "doc" "debug" "lib" "static" "bin"
+ "examples" "gui" "tests" "utils"
+ "include"))))
+ (package-outputs package)))
+ . 1)
+
;; Match regexps on the raw Texinfo since formatting it is quite expensive
;; and doesn't have much of an effect on search results.
(,(lambda (package)
diff --git a/tests/guix-package.sh b/tests/guix-package.sh
index 0d60481895..262d29bd59 100644
--- a/tests/guix-package.sh
+++ b/tests/guix-package.sh
@@ -398,3 +398,28 @@ else
grep "manifest.scm:[1-3]:.*wonderful-package.*: unbound variable" \
"$module_dir/stderr"
fi
+
+# Verify that package outputs are included in search results.
+rm -rf "$module_dir"
+mkdir "$module_dir"
+cat > "$module_dir/foo.scm"<<EOF
+(define-module (foo)
+ #:use-module (guix packages)
+ #:use-module (guix build-system trivial))
+
+(define-public dummy-package
+ (package
+ (name "dummy-package")
+ (version "dummy-version")
+ (outputs '("out" "dummy-output"))
+ (source #f)
+ ;; Without a real build system, the "guix pacakge -s" command will fail.
+ (build-system trivial-build-system)
+ (synopsis "dummy-synopsis")
+ (description "dummy-description")
+ (home-page "https://dummy-home-page")
+ (license #f)))
+EOF
+guix package -L "$module_dir" -s dummy-output > /tmp/out
+test "`guix package -L "$module_dir" -s dummy-output | grep ^name:`" = "name: dummy-package"
+rm -rf "$module_dir"
--
2.20.1
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-08 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-05 19:39 bug#35588: guix package --search does not search output names Chris Marusich
2019-05-05 21:41 ` bug#35588: [PATCH] ui: Search matches additional package outputs Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2019-05-06 9:08 ` Chris Marusich
2019-05-06 9:32 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-05-07 0:57 ` Chris Marusich
2019-05-07 8:25 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-05-08 6:50 ` Chris Marusich [this message]
2019-05-08 10:39 ` bug#35588: [PATCH] ui: Search matches additional package outputs., " Ludovic Courtès
2019-05-09 7:22 ` Chris Marusich
2019-05-07 22:24 ` swedebugia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878svhv3re.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=cmmarusich@gmail.com \
--cc=35588@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=swedebugia@riseup.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.