From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hiEVD-0003zF-8Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 04:51:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hiEVC-0007gT-86 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 04:51:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hiEVC-0007gH-0P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 04:51:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hiEVB-0004Vc-Re for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 04:51:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#36415] [PATCH] gnu: Add qlogo. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20190628080358.14910-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 10:50:45 +0200 Message-ID: <878stgvmze.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 36415@debbugs.gnu.org Arun Isaac writes: >> I got this when running rounds=3D2: >> The following builds are still in progress: >> /gnu/store/yv7gjrplyym3arqi6qqiiqy3l4wzszp3-qlogo-0.92.drv >> /gnu/store/ivln0c98vr9n8j25alx1dg1gbzpja11k-qtbase-5.11.3.drv >> /gnu/store/ysv72wwn0gfjiqx2y4rxbf0gnhiv94yp-cups-2.2.11.drv >> /gnu/store/mimhpwdwik9madwir21a2d0z6i1in7j0-cups-filters-1.23.0.drv >> /gnu/store/syc8fwdl3mz2kxncd1k2mkqq4mslvxyv-qlogo-0.92.drv > > I get a similar message too. > >> I'm interpreting this as qlogo is not reproducible, no? > > I don't know. I have never understood how reproducibility checking works > in Guix. Shouldn't --rounds=3D2 cause `guix build' to error out if there > is some non-determinism? Yes. This might be a regression. Build being reported as =E2=80=9Cin progress=E2=80=9D is a feature. It=E2= =80=99s used to indicate remaining builds when more than one thing is being built. In this case, though, it seems like a bug. To test for reproducibility in this case you may want to use =E2=80=9C--che= ck=E2=80=9D after building the thing once. --=20 Ricardo