Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> So people see less information on terminals that support hyperlinks,
> right?
>
> I think there should be as much information displayed whether or not the
> terminal supports hyperlinks.  Otherwise it can be confusing.
> (Especially since we can’t tell whether the terminal really supports
> hyperlinks: we don’t know whether it displays clickable links.)
>
> Thoughts?

The file/URL was not displayed in terminals that support hyperlinks.
This was also true before this commit.

The user has to guess that they are clickable.

I agree that displaying the file / URL in all cases and making the
clickable if possible would be an improvement.

>> --- a/guix/ui.scm
>> +++ b/guix/ui.scm
>> @@ -1637,7 +1637,7 @@ DURATION-RELATION with the current time."
>>      (let* ((file   (generation-file-name profile number))
>>             (link   (if (supports-hyperlinks?)
>>                         (cut file-hyperlink file <>)
>> -                       identity))
>> +                       (cut format #f (G_ "~a~%file: ~a") <> file)))
>>             (header (format #f (link (highlight (G_ "Generation ~a\t~a")))
>
> I understand it’s a matter of taste, but I’m not a fan of the extra
> line here.

You mean the "~%" in "~a~%file: ~a"?
How would you like to display it?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/