From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms11 with LMTPS
	id gAzjIdew3F4nfwAA0tVLHw
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 09:18:15 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp2 with LMTPS
	id 0JbGHdew3F6tVwAAB5/wlQ
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 09:18:15 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6A4940509
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sun,  7 Jun 2020 09:18:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:52318 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jhrRU-0003Gu-Ml
	for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 05:18:12 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36614)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jhrRK-0003Gh-RB
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 05:18:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41760)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jhrRK-0003Ah-7S
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 05:18:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jhrRK-0003zU-3X
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 05:18:02 -0400
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Subject: [bug#41689] Add cl-rdkafka
Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 09:18:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.41689.B41689.159152147115320@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41689
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com>
Cc: 41689@debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 41689-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41689.159152147115320
 (code B ref 41689); Sun, 07 Jun 2020 09:18:02 +0000
Received: (at 41689) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jun 2020 09:17:51 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jhrR9-0003z1-3E
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 05:17:51 -0400
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:47988)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <glv@posteo.net>) id 1jhrR7-0003yk-0k
 for 41689@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 05:17:49 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4B416005F
 for <41689@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun,  7 Jun 2020 11:17:42 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1591521462; bh=0cwckZ9RMZWQNs79LnNoQr8eKF4qCKTD2WKZhXc1Ixc=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From;
 b=oAZy3Tm756Sf6ZOZ6i+W6hQFHS3uu09ksc4NW6qRvVEpDqwqU39rZCp8GsZX+3TJw
 AXh5acBU3qcovtbzIt/wBX9JqKxyhgAo8qN3ablQjz3imkwrDmrIenwoTx134EAkzp
 4shp6tg/cBnagIzGkRq55n+s2XXUh+ABdmLa0kLPTwicsSD4KoloXLp/PCZITMBtvy
 WzwxrQ6IRoaoVg6jL0bV78NJRBiYz5x3Eysstvt70xcWkChcwYPuGB8xEx+2VDN0y8
 JL58Xm1do5Y3NGrgxRj6kHQmaCYb8/e1tXYgQXT3Yy+VwFvQxx4PepHNOlTLTlANqx
 wzQTQ6TNs8J0A==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49frPx2vYjz9rxK;
 Sun,  7 Jun 2020 11:17:41 +0200 (CEST)
References: <CA+TvSRiU5ahybY06ZjEm8=b_JpQPBcft4Cvq_PhKJjEbsw5Axw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87bllxfw6j.fsf@yamatai>
 <CA+TvSRibuVJ2c3wQftqoAvwQO54huaN8unM=p3Z5FgYyrLFV-A@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.8; emacs 26.3
From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
In-reply-to: <CA+TvSRibuVJ2c3wQftqoAvwQO54huaN8unM=p3Z5FgYyrLFV-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 11:17:40 +0200
Message-ID: <878sgzb5fv.fsf@yamatai>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Scanner: scn0
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=oAZy3Tm7;
	dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none);
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.51
X-TUID: wpDC7mN/T+Ii

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com> skribis:

> That is a mistake; there's no reason it can't be listed as a regular input.
>
> During my tests to confirm this, I realized that sbcl-cl-rdkafka
> wasn't actually producing any useful output. This led me down a
> rabbit-hole (albeit a productive one). Below is a new patch set.
>
> 11:23 kate says: guix refresh -l sbcl-lparallel
> Building the following 4 packages would ensure 8 dependent packages
> are rebuilt: ecl-cl-rdkafka@1.0.2 cl-rdkafka@1.0.2
> cl-random-forest@0.1-0.85fbdd4 next@1.5.0
>
> All dependent packages continue to build.
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:01 AM Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>> > (propagated-inputs
>> >  `(("librdkafka" ,librdkafka)))
>>
>> Why is the librdkafka library a propagated input instead of a regular
>> input?

Thanks. Patches pushed as 388a89750ec60a320dd7b6a0b0f174cbed4f50c6 and
64174aff927f4f9da18ea452247c838e6bab3306. Except I didn't push the
definition for ecl-cl-rdkafka because it didn't build (because of the
phase moving a file before the cleanup phase IIRC).

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQkUwKxurH4Z/3KlryPP4Yfgut6mgUCXtywtAAKCRCPP4Yfgut6
mrWeAP9OUVo8tAGAONptQcqU+ZO82Oe9sIQwqwzJDEigd0IyzAEAxIYiB/Wc42rU
iXJqLZWd1872pv2KYWqw2ErCP0aDQQE=
=u2eQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--