From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms11 with LMTPS
	id 8Nw+Jlva315BNwAA0tVLHw
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:52:11 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp1 with LMTPS
	id GOYHIlva315HKgAAbx9fmQ
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:52:11 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E65BB9401D0
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue,  9 Jun 2020 18:52:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:44972 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jijM1-0002Yu-Qz
	for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:52:09 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43068)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jijLu-0002Wv-N2
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:52:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49383)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jijLu-00043d-Dn
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:52:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jijLu-0000Zg-D1
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:52:02 -0400
Subject: bug#41760: ganv-1.5.4 fails at configure
Resent-From: Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:52:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.41760.D41760.15917286982169.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 41760
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Thorsten Wilms <t_w_@freenet.de>
Mail-Followup-To: 41760@debbugs.gnu.org, marius@gnu.org, t_w_@freenet.de
Received: via spool by 41760-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D41760.15917286982169
 (code D ref 41760); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:52:02 +0000
Received: (at 41760-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2020 18:51:38 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60928 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jijLW-0000Yu-J0
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:51:38 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34886)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <marius@gnu.org>) id 1jijLU-0000Yf-Ty
 for 41760-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:51:37 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47599)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <marius@gnu.org>)
 id 1jijLO-0003yI-Kc; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:51:31 -0400
Received: from ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no ([84.202.68.75]:47942
 helo=localhost)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <marius@gnu.org>)
 id 1jijLO-0003n5-2T; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:51:30 -0400
From: Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200609091421.79a6cca61450d4e1db415ae8@freenet.de>
References: <20200608173301.df3f6f491faba6d8c1b2c8ea@freenet.de>
 <87o8pt5sux.fsf@gnu.org> <20200609091421.79a6cca61450d4e1db415ae8@freenet.de>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:51:27 +0200
Message-ID: <878sgwgjio.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: 41760-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Scanner: scn0
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=none;
	dmarc=none;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.61
X-TUID: sGFpZXXLY1K7

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thorsten Wilms <t_w_@freenet.de> writes:

> On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 20:12:54 +0200
> Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> ganv was updated to 1.6.0 a while back.  Do you get the same failure
>> after a 'guix pull'?
>
> That was after =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99. =E2=80=98ganv=E2=80=99 is pul=
led in via =E2=80=98ingen=E2=80=99 here.
>
> ```
> build of /gnu/store/bxz04gap29dxsmjvb3z4hjdid9l1fil7-ganv-1.5.4-1.12f7d6b=
04.drv failed
> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bx/z04gap29dxsmjvb3z4hjdid9l1fil7-g=
anv-1.5.4-1.12f7d6b04.drv.bz2'.
> substituting /gnu/store/8vgp4lv6k16ffq5zhfsjdqb2mpxa5642-aubio-0.4.9...
> |guix package: error: build of `/gnu/store/ahx77sfl5zxgs37vx1g445czp7scrq=
p1-ingen-0.0.0-2.cc4a4db33.drv' failed
> ```

Oh, I see.  Probably the special 'ganv-devel' input of 'ingen' is
obsolete with the recent 'ganv' update.  Difficult to tell because there
are no comments about it, but I went ahead and removed it in
c178d5fa5a2cfc07f4a9ab9cadeb6218d6c6483.  Let's see if anyone complains!

Forgot to mention the bug report in the commit message though :-/

Thanks,
Marius

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl7f2i8ACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPrHywgAn0jNhLwsMcvdUq/0aKGCCs+PjRlPNt8gOw7OWVNm5cgynT+O2gYmGovM
9f1ljR8CB6gGaY1PQZZNadjjVMR9TmNdjUSFT541WFW8utUrpHcLemQRpsAYXC2r
y7JP1n4S0dXRrU+FbGGAyVQ2eWH5HpNSf2ZUZUqajYFO/76Ww8/sTCm47c+1nKSG
b3LYiHnWUHG8Em0TFSMgfdQS63n2FPNtKr6xrtK9J7mItGbd7U40VqCp9lLkmzuB
atFEtkjnRUv/dWth2KrxLhnNjuTS6tXUpwRzIse1rIdAuBFbaHYarUtzFkDtqQJS
S9npndilluRAS0SgM4m2FQj4DSQrHA==
=87+R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--