From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id JVdkF5PUUWAYXwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:06:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id gHiuEpPUUWBZWQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:06:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx2.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CBCA18F67 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:06:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMT46-0004XV-6u for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:06:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMT3y-0004WV-95 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:06:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMT3y-0006zS-0T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:06:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMT3x-0005pi-QX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#47111] [PATCH] doc: Document the guidelines for removing inactive committers. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47111 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Famulari Cc: 47111@debbugs.gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou Received: via spool by 47111-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47111.161597554022391 (code B ref 47111); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 47111) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2021 10:05:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42093 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMT3c-0005p5-Bx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:05:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34994) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMT3Z-0005or-TD for 47111@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:05:38 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMT3S-0006bP-8c; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:05:31 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=44730 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lMT3H-0006id-AX; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:05:22 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <7dca28c09a55a3b4ec3da7668586faa84130a65a.1615581119.git.leo@famulari.name> <87y2esylpq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:05:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:44:03 -0500") Message-ID: <878s6m5c4l.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1615975571; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=w+1MZ+NnV0FYJJc+c8WBkXP4ntS84iKAA2pLUsoF6Lo=; b=p2mXh6YlyaTii2qb5/rTqdLQiTkLVnaujkJi5DyIG2+X6G9usOwQduHfdxZMlS8rX0KMLg YDc2C4x/k5vUqLCe+Sh97Ab5sEMMo896QXAamJeiRqCQaPN2wIzRzU6aijUSPaw6Hurm3q WJsOXBMhGI0kFhHi+GsU1ARUwIRHf0Vr6zdnLQaKNtiV15wAND2RCimduhmssvWOt3WRX/ upoPodunHL1b8UtRXL1xHwj3ytOdivhnfjprUDWSJvG+v8vIb/f3avmK79Mr8Gg6J1FOK9 K0EbfaLDin6eSWx8V1tsWRADyFHWFVwd0EjYn25e/i9MiTV8BRUcu1xCxcXqag== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1615975571; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=kvTc5vE1EpeqNG5bw3wG2bkG5BX7Nhdc1M62ZTx3snK4uTkHJpa1R1Ck0aNFehQxSa6vRW jF9XdTCTmSlvAVgPZtCkDaMcfwIhtcu1NA9oNfukv/jEIRQEmLrMIqVK0zvQSTOjSAkQP9 ltFZCBFTCqMtikrYv/s4J2eAKYR6emokPBS9Pk5dRA1lmH/ZYQEAWK/LWH0HQaGOQt7iXA fqpUWx8dhuSV/zcBWYwZw1N2Og+T8gxfPfm6OhS1UBTw8tlDztw4wNG69gGmowpCw/YZnG lHDKW30StqWdtNmNsWP5RsNgPXh8RHFndakrmHGIzSEpzJIKrl01/7zXH72CCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.90 Authentication-Results: aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0CBCA18F67 X-Spam-Score: -2.90 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: JEVDZTUvqweF Hi Leo, Leo Famulari skribis: > How about this: > > "In order to reduce the possibility of mistakes, committers will have > ..." I like this. > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 09:07:16AM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Also, about my second suggestion at the end of the message, I want to >> make it clear that regaining commit access is trivial, and does not >> imply another vouching process (IIUC), i.e., "you can ask to..." sounds >> like it could be refused. > > It could be refused. It really depends on the situation, and the > decision is at the discretion of the maintainers. In many cases a simple > "Hi, I'm back!" email will be enough, but the text I propose is not > offering a guarantee. Perhaps, after =E2=80=9Cthey can ask to regain commit access by emailing the maintainers=E2=80=9D we can add =E2=80=9Cwithout going through the vouching= process=E2=80=9D? Would that address your concerns, Nicolas? To be clear, I think this would be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. I expect that by far the most frequent situation would be one where maintainers know the person and immediately restore their access. In other cases, as the project gets older, maintainers could feel the need to go through the regular contribution and vouching process. IOW, I think this process should be as smooth as possible, but we should not suggest it=E2=80=99s automatic. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99.