From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id eGwyAshzbGAALwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 16:44:24 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id CGO8N8dzbGDILAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:44:23 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E80A2820D for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 16:44:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59334 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTmwH-0003n5-AW for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:44:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTmv0-0002RP-MP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:43:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTmuz-0002jr-V1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lTmuz-0001Ku-UC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:43:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47617: Docker containers retain references to the runc used Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 47617 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 47617@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16177201615098 (code B ref -1); Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:43:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2021 14:42:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41406 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lTmuf-0001KA-50 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:42:41 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56446) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lTmub-0001Jz-QG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:42:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTmub-0001vK-F6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:42:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]:40602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTmuY-0002VF-QJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:42:36 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id 7so15133505qka.7 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 07:42:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=DvG4nSLvz2rgbRK0pz7rremJaQBt4uXTmeLlt5r+vdo=; b=rQxscaOQuQ08zy856WEcrFbNZzW7l6tZnhAukg/pzaREj1zYElqscdxrW715eUxsi1 KrGB3g7u3j7bod0K8RWXqvcMZpOokf3nKEa/4jyzxJ9lu3rTIdJEX6/EMWc0NLCj6vdl KNjvmnDWSjGy+N2Zj/IZjlC8hOPoU/gmDxXkl+pUOANGvfB8QHGA/VFcB3g7jBB3buyz NYZz+nS43h2A3hLkIcRGSby6w93HikXClEG5vS6zHp+d1Vv8w+rnrLUWlhCUue23bOTz jGshDJpxQ+NZ2Vln1uGJQ6njpDge5amMb9RfERrzzfBfVKFCXALs7Y8bg5aKnXhSEVR0 lxjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=DvG4nSLvz2rgbRK0pz7rremJaQBt4uXTmeLlt5r+vdo=; b=fREbrT+gGaWCT+YVJkaFyfghFbyb28ws6+hM+DfEpJ2A+4pIodtDOQJV+S+cSmHZd8 exgjiMboFp1K31z1HeuQM+27Vt6RwePNQehdyC/ukqlBwVucSdzp56s4Pa7nBB6HSnjS BSj2PIJP8EZBFIiKkJr85zYJkLDXeo9oNIKlvwNpR2hWjhUUAmxVw5jMXSX/IYS1Dsl7 UoJfkstKta4rIUs4l+tf4NFVu0IdWlMLlkOUeKPsjs3laFvhSQ8ay4LJuvGP2wlxUTzN qpGisi6dpHANzjIAiBVWGKO+kl+ww73vrOuRd+LPBw/IkdZix8SSUnTu+3fT8lvpFyRn nwvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AdCQhPYhOcLy8zS65pvY0LUFnIO+rbo7L+IbUOkm7zC+BzFeJ 2QPAAg6uu2Ul84iXTwrvU3GvnDLz3mA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0oHaecXDTnwdbV8vC/YTB9Rs7JeNDMfb6v5g7oDMVmHFS3JP8mH96/U6NJKsNn5iIf4OiIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:c8a:: with SMTP id q10mr29348883qki.216.1617720152942; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 07:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-149-132.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.149.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h5sm14776344qtq.1.2021.04.06.07.42.32 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Apr 2021 07:42:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:42:31 -0400 Message-ID: <878s5vpj8o.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::731; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x731.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1617720263; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe: list-post:dkim-signature; bh=DvG4nSLvz2rgbRK0pz7rremJaQBt4uXTmeLlt5r+vdo=; b=jxjGv7ey9iK3y7AJRYr/wPXfcqmYNixTnwP8TimB0bo45a5zsmhqjX+tf9QwqGYqCCoFNX ZV/WH5kyUSTYryyvwAOkYS/DYzGSu7NnHgT2CB6DysBQOdOCsGpUogUqtUJ0kbBiEXWHNz y3Y35oIQ37rTFo60WCKkqDG871TWmAXc2oRmsKKjCKr86HYVeBe1QbBUYKnwzX5cWGwaxb 8S8K6+fBp7/hV/257jb+ta0mSlvkLAojM/8jPs77DAQ+Gh9yczHQoMWIJpf3GQ63ITSHdA 7dYRqPXRHuZBR+PSQ3yv7q8/gFyWotvfZGVppDHMv0vI2xZEDhp3PLuwlEe1XQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1617720263; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hnGVHNnkcLGvfKP5m21Yx2twlebWmJG1iDU9WAt40BXPPPS2ggaWKRN7wWq3u16cz/BSvv r7vKo0WZSjrK7np8p4rgtmyGX1wOxAgsqP9lzkiEo7hUKwZUkz0X395rWZerqw9Ku6Zxoy HyQyhSRCGgm8BVYUcyoVGTQjgZhkviMUZmUq9WjX90DK2Le5SQ87TlfaCuHGOWn2DY5UaP FFMgcQ8H3z+5wwXOJholvuSBMKnOzEUhoCJHSI+UUsLmJfP63Vu+BYoMyYqml7ehbY3UkE 3ajYHDao54tpFZx1+sm6kbVohqrTho9FmX/iH57Y72RKgPyIR4lnfz3lMD7uPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=rQxscaOQ; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.16 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=rQxscaOQ; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6E80A2820D X-Spam-Score: 0.16 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: hhIp7oAEdhqw Hello Guix! I had this surprise today, after reconfiguring my Guix System with an upgraded docker: Upon attempting to run an existing container created with the previous Docker version, I got: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ERROR: for moodle-docker_db_1 Cannot start service db: Unknown runtime specified /gnu/store/jx64b4nnh6yvsbp117bfjc5spqz0jfq5-runc-1.0.0-rc6/sbin/runc --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It seems the containers retain the exact references to the runc used, and it somehow cause the execution to fail when it doesn't match with the runc that the current Docker program is using. The workaround is to destroy the containers and recreate them from scratch on this upgraded Docker instance. Thanks, Maxim