From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>,
Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Cc: 48696@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#48696] [PATCH 1/3] doc: Structure the "Commit Access" section.
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 11:30:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878s3xhopf.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8FB0AFE9-B53B-42F7-8635-D6B4DA763FC3@lepiller.eu> (Julien Lepiller's message of "Thu, 27 May 2021 09:55:37 -0400")
Hi Julien & Maxime,
Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> skribis:
>>+@example
>>+git config commit.gpgsign true
>>+git config user.signingkey CABBA6EA1DC0FF33
>>+@end example
>>+
>>+You can prevent yourself from accidentally pushing unsigned commits to
>>+Savannah by using the pre-push Git hook called located at
>>+@file{etc/git/pre-push}:
>
> This sentence sounds weird. Isn't "called" superfluous?
[...]
>> +@example
>> +git config commit.gpgsign true
>> +git config user.signingkey CABBA6EA1DC0FF33
>> +@end example
>
> Is that meant to represent ‘cabbage and coffee’ in l33t?
> Maybe replace this with something like
>
> +@example
>> +git config commit.gpgsign true
>> +# Substitute the fingerprint of your public PGP key
>> +git config user.signingkey CABBA6EA1DC0FF33
>> +@end example
>
> Basic, I know, but people have to learn the basics from
> somewhere, so maybe best be explicit here.
Yes, that makes sense to me.
Note that this text is not new, the patch merely shuffles it around.
But I agree, I’ll address the two issues above once we’ve agreed on the
rest.
>> + [... some newlines after @section{...} ]
>
> These extra newlines could go directly into 'master' I guess.
> The rest of [PATCH 1/3] seems ok to me?
I don’t know. :-)
Patch #1 just moves text around and adds sectioning.
BTW, the whole patch series targets ‘master’ (there’s no point in
documenting our procedures in a branch other than ‘master’).
Thanks,
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-29 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-27 12:32 [bug#48696] [PATCH 0/3] Documenting commit reverts and revocation Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-27 12:35 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH 1/3] doc: Structure the "Commit Access" section Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-27 12:35 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH 2/3] doc: Add "Addressing Mistakes" section Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-27 19:19 ` Christopher Baines
2021-05-29 10:22 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-30 10:29 ` Christopher Baines
2021-06-02 9:22 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH 0/3] Documenting commit reverts and revocation Ludovic Courtès
2021-06-08 14:02 ` Christopher Baines
2021-06-11 14:05 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-06-13 10:15 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH v2 0/4] " Ludovic Courtès
2021-06-13 10:15 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH v2 1/4] doc: Structure the "Commit Access" section Ludovic Courtès
2021-06-13 11:50 ` Xinglu Chen
2021-06-13 11:56 ` Xinglu Chen
2021-06-13 10:15 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH v2 2/4] doc: Add "Addressing Issues" section Ludovic Courtès
2021-06-13 10:15 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH v2 3/4] doc: Explain more reasons for commit revocation Ludovic Courtès
2021-06-13 10:15 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH v2 4/4] doc: Clarify Git commit signing; fix typo Ludovic Courtès
2021-06-18 12:37 ` bug#48696: [PATCH 0/3] Documenting commit reverts and revocation Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-27 12:35 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH 3/3] doc: Explain more reasons for commit revocation Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-27 19:13 ` Maxime Devos
2021-05-27 20:07 ` Christopher Baines
2021-05-29 9:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-29 11:28 ` Christopher Baines
2021-05-29 20:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-27 13:55 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH 1/3] doc: Structure the "Commit Access" section Julien Lepiller
2021-05-29 9:30 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2021-05-27 19:10 ` Maxime Devos
2021-05-27 14:16 ` [bug#48696] [PATCH 0/3] Documenting commit reverts and revocation Leo Famulari
2021-05-30 12:49 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878s3xhopf.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=48696@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=julien@lepiller.eu \
--cc=maximedevos@telenet.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.