From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id cJBZFBt4EmGpVwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:59:07 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id oHsLEBt4EmFoMQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:59:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE0972725C for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:59:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50962 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDRLV-00018I-Oc for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:59:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDRLS-00018A-K7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:59:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDRLS-0005k8-DV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:59:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDRLS-0005jf-CK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49823] [PATCH] gnu: Add jsonnet. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49823 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Vivien Kraus Cc: 49823@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Prikler , Maxime Devos Received: via spool by 49823-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49823.162860033322028 (code B ref 49823); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:59:02 +0000 Received: (at 49823) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2021 12:58:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDRLJ-0005jE-0k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:58:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53206) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDRLH-0005j1-6S for 49823@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:58:51 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48094) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDRL8-0005am-PN; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:58:42 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=45056 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDRL8-0000g6-GM; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:58:42 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <71fbbaa57a2c1dba8f0d956ea162c2e15d332e0c.camel@planete-kraus.eu> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:58:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <71fbbaa57a2c1dba8f0d956ea162c2e15d332e0c.camel@planete-kraus.eu> (Vivien Kraus's message of "Mon, 02 Aug 2021 17:01:07 +0200") Message-ID: <878s19sbgf.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1628600346; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=nixfzzCwfCadVlbKn6tCjf+HFL/f6Izx+qRBCVfIDH8=; b=FeImO7jha/oLUVjT3MtpIB2fYNWRB6anBwuwIkZJjB449SJVlrGpoF83nimT5a9sqK/+so Tgl0wdO4PAeZqvpC6IOnei9MMEgiihct1I/ZnVCB+pElNnx5Wsu+/EO344iuHt280kEmCX lroZDtOnrwBDGK/mxH71kVnEu2DpO+u92t2uknEyOlvVuZCb0M5TLkyFmnz7MEtGic9tC2 NjEfc9JkyAu3V4IHyIYuGMWJW++khKdO8WcRhRMXjLgr7jiypfSBuRJOQSkeEKx2/U8ag5 gEX8KCp9IFtSQQ8Fw/Ndss4jv1TALQeJMCIbHNphYQZL2Ygg/QL5Pfdzf0kJWw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1628600346; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Y6DAXCZtk0pqOsKHle4ILWU1BAhKuwghL/nbggDiEmS4Hh4GXfayidBL6ea/9w0pVC6q+C UUCaEa3CRmtGISC8fBSaMVKwVgypynk7rlCgerR7d6OZLFmbXx4yCCUKBSTV4yLZduzhZj LfCY/EfFQ6HZ6CZCxUppOuePVpCLttafov0EoFBblv0v9/qDZP27HekMdmYsGXZfTLj66V 7Ux4QMUJaPuK/8RcUAru4ZNAIlSGTfCi2rsqNn9zREUWIFZ6BNtANphS4Xjnt2Ev5ABT7l 3PMdl5wliHHgTiJvHQUeiQgxeyH+QddNxxTxJ+FxZHQinJczdtcYBRtqk2pabQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.91 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AE0972725C X-Spam-Score: -2.91 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: fzORvtZZtED4 Hi Vivien, Vivien Kraus skribis: > Here is jsonnet. I don=E2=80=99t fully understand what it does, but thank= s to > leoprikler, I know it is a dependency to package GraalJS, an > interpreter for JavaScript on the Java Virtual Machine. > > For the sake of having "no dependencies", it bundles a custom > implementation of MD5. According to a comment in the associated > license, it is taken from the implementation of bzflag, but it does not > seem to use the same as of today. > > I decided to use nettle, and add a few lines of C++ to shape it into > the required interface. I think using Nettle is a wise decision; however, it=E2=80=99s a decision f= or upstream to make IMO. I=E2=80=99m not comfortable with shipping custom md5.{cpp,h} and CMakeLists.txt; to me, we=E2=80=99d be taking a bit too muc= h of upstream=E2=80=99s burden and delivering something that=E2=80=99s quite dif= ferent. Apart from that, the last patch you sent LGTM. Thoughts? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.