From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id UEtyGlcHWmTJXwEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 May 2023 10:41:59 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id gMdcGlcHWmSk4QAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 May 2023 10:41:59 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BC0B33AD7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 10:41:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwIul-0001Vf-PK; Tue, 09 May 2023 04:41:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwIuk-0001Sc-BD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2023 04:41:42 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwIui-0007n5-Pq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2023 04:41:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:54d1:d5d4:280e:f699]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 680F827BBEA; Tue, 9 May 2023 09:41:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2645acbb; Tue, 9 May 2023 08:41:38 +0000 (UTC) References: <168347913021.32190.10808857919894440138@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20230507170531.26A00C22F14@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87r0rrzjbr.fsf@cbaines.net> <878rdyqfwv.fsf@protonmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.8.13; emacs 28.2 From: Christopher Baines To: John Kehayias Cc: Maxim Cournoyer , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3. Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 09:39:25 +0100 In-reply-to: <878rdyqfwv.fsf@protonmail.com> Message-ID: <878rdx522l.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1683621719; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RX3DwO/Tnx/7HhEanG/fxMrHs6rhaT3RuI/lIfRn9ANkEh/cn/xxYiRNTDJOsafAYyMwv5 F/tmlYE5wJG7iOicfqW/7j/gky3Hvzg15kbkXUc65aK0XbSFXMyiq6zwudL8GLooJEKbK6 FcnZ36CcFhKuJiao8LYEkwecN3nyAgTPGWDey1pjmVg7uoAVNd/NsDQtz5DBl1C7Z3a9He FKfZQDJtxHUurEgHZHRFA3IY2T9MiQ4EI9HNwcpiZ5Xj/c+TW+v3P0O2V9ASwRb/JcppTa rNP1BQxzpol46LhFSCv1//MQC+bG9gk9hz2r0w4Ib4T7My8QYcgiAq2i3mZxaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1683621719; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=7GgL0AOU8RjnKPSx/e5oh8iajqfnDG4NQAJD5ykRyTw=; b=apjcmIfyXfYafPUbk1LlqEq3zYrl1yM3cqUo+6ouTsckkoe4RW6DEglaxUIImTeNuMSRFo dZt8iNNK6e2HrPjNgWLiyiEUKHNlXZ8r5OR8xTsR37FC7Q6WxrXNKR9kPzoPKEuwPsx0+U yKtc0D+w4jgyweRZeVF9J149ntUpZNvVcXISVA1SH66uGbju3onLw8Iu20lanoE8cqyGQp tdJi+rxGmD4SedaiHlnSkchAM9w5aDReMvJAIO5tQ146B//Z06CihBBnXKiGDgRG9OX52W aBAtTaHBTZ282SnkKit5lvNoMDLsI/CD2NlS5gDOx31SyT+sie+Udn/rlKZrdw== X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.58 X-Spam-Score: -3.58 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2BC0B33AD7 X-TUID: Z/JdXvFnZhhE --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John Kehayias writes: > Hi Christopher and Maxim, > > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:41 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > >> guix-commits@gnu.org writes: >> >>> apteryx pushed a commit to branch master >>> in repository guix. >>> >>> commit 0be7838105806819f4586ec9130382a66a22880e >>> Author: Kaelyn Takata >>> AuthorDate: Thu May 4 20:12:46 2023 +0000 >>> >>> gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Update to 23.0.3. >>> [source]: Remove obsolete patch and update HTTPS url. >>> [arguments]: Enable the crocus gallium driver. >>> * gnu/packages/patches/mesa-fix-sporadic-test-failures.patch: Delet= e file. >>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it. >>> --- >>> gnu/local.mk | 1 - >>> gnu/packages/gl.scm | 14 ++++------- >>> .../patches/mesa-fix-sporadic-test-failures.patch | 27 --------------= -------- >>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) >> >> =E2=86=92 guix refresh -l mesa >> Building the following 1954 packages would ensure 4257 dependent >> packages are rebuilt ... >> >> >> I know there's been some discussion about changing processes regarding >> changes like this that impact lots of packages, but as far as I'm aware, >> the documented process hasn't changed yet. So should this have gone to >> core-updates, and not been directly pushed to master? >> > > I should take some responsibility over what happened here as I had > volunteered as a sort of "branch manager" (to use the terminology > later in this thread) but I was a bit slower than I wanted. My plan > was roughly in line with what we are discussing, reviewing the > patches, pushing to a new "mesa-updates" branch, and then asking for > someone to start a build job. We could then have people more easily > test or just to check build for build failures and ensure good > substitute coverage upon merging. Don't feel responsible for not doing things John, I'm advocating here for less haste and more caution. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmRaB0JfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xc09Q/9H5jAyu2MxNJM4Ah5yYi9RJTk9sBAbDgd GnqpzzWMo7AMqV6dwMqChH3aPIjREvmSp9qG564VZxtLG9gEoqo9dmp4hvL7P3Lw GFK5mq+Jjn0ckLrT3RigNvlQ2QRG7tlA+dekYAapZAKrdYjuMOemNnUfmvUGAclo Xl7Bn3g12cdIHTFvWXmH1cCVkQfLsKENLD65DcHB4J4Ct7wIlpEKvQABoLkpGDFl SK4sHUzvpPmxsSrJDNRUDCxlldcrsVfnWfmxJLnHJ47baXMyGVb5lGALgj4ps3IW nt6oLiMbxJlRlekZXmjsQXL9Ysu+Vzkz4Cx+vR/Feun6AyCXZPyD70uKNHQLyCCn Fyc0CYR96T7JC9f8YjmAUkCvnOfcbdvC4mwtwmfEBMDb4xmOi4KuTfmtPHThlwN/ pMHqjD0/lQ0qpRZyeOw6xF4C7CzegeUVTyBQG1TPlGJQ4vVPbwLBLeZSHYxGpGcb eiZUa3LZKQ8b5StYip5hq+sjsza+ytiVETvdyqdwWo1/XqGTViSgn1f/ugeYce9w H+6iE5ZqSQV9zLMv8TjIO3asdOY+4jH8KrcHNKLbqHRMhw4qxH7ZyDfoh1XuE8mE ojfZOgy8pDD966TSGIOBdoUS7jSkmTwjBMTalK+1CgLScIOU9xwtDPdl1M0HTU3y blF0wiKc6cY= =PzQr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--