From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Rollback problems
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:59:06 +0100
Message-ID: <877gn2o9md.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <201301232148.46744.andreas@enge.fr> <87mwvzsdzt.fsf@gnu.org>
	<201301240017.55013.andreas@enge.fr> <87mwvystku.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87ip6mzjc3.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52094)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TyPCm-0006IT-T0
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:59:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TyPCl-0003s0-DY
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:59:08 -0500
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:17422)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1TyPCl-0003rc-6T
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:59:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87ip6mzjc3.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Sassmannshausen's message of
	"Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:33:48 +0000")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Alex Sassmannshausen <alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com> skribis:

> Is rollback supposed to be one-directional? I.e. you can go back in
> time, but you can't then go forward in time again ('undo' and 'redo')?

That=E2=80=99s a good question: should undos be stored in the history?
IOW, should users be able to undo an undo operation, as is usually
possible with text editors and similar?

Ludo=E2=80=99.