From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Python 3 native-search-paths
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 15:31:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gf0r7lq.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130901071112.GA7907@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sun, 1 Sep 2013 09:11:12 +0200")
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 08:06:34PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> It has no effect in the build of Python itself; its effect is only when
>> building Python code that uses Python and one or more Python libs.
>
> I still think something is wrong here and that this variable should be
> included into the computation of the hash. When I now recompile a
> package depending on python, it gets the same hash, but it is different.
>
> Or more easily: The python package with the new native-search-paths behaves
> differently from the previous one, so it should have a different hash.
The hash is the hash of all the inputs to the build process,
recursively. If a single bit changes somewhere, the hash changes.
But here, search path specifications do not affect the build process of
packages that carry them in any way (an improvement over Nix where
everything is an environment variable, and thus an input to the hash,
even if it is not meant to influence the build process.)
When ‘native-search-paths’ changes in python3, it’s not python3 that
behaves differently: it’s the build process of packages using it that
does.
Hope this clarify things.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-01 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-31 15:40 Python 3 native-search-paths Andreas Enge
2013-08-31 16:07 ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-08-31 16:43 ` Andreas Enge
2013-08-31 18:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-09-01 7:11 ` Andreas Enge
2013-09-01 13:31 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2013-09-01 13:41 ` Andreas Enge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877gf0r7lq.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=andreas@enge.fr \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.