From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Cross-compilation fixes
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:55:53 +0100
Message-ID: <877gb7wew6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20131214150609.GA10980@intra>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47365)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VrsVV-0000i1-HV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:56:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VrsVP-0002uJ-Ce
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:56:01 -0500
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:61223)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1VrsVP-0002uD-5t
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:55:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20131214150609.GA10980@intra> (John Darrington's message of
	"Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:06:10 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:

> Attached are several patches addressing cross-compilation issues,
> culminating in a large patch affecting lots of files, moving=20
> various "inputs" to "native-inputs".

Could you send them inline, one message per patch?  That would
significantly ease review.

(=E2=80=98git format-patch=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98git send-email=E2=80=99 ca=
n be used for that, as noted
in HACKING.)

> It's possible that I may have made a few errors here, but I think
> the overall effect is a positive one.

:-)

Thanks in advance!

Ludo=E2=80=99.