[PATCHES] Propagate inputs for libxml2 and libxslt

[PATCHES] Propagate inputs for libxml2 and libxslt

[David Thompson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 359 bytes --]

Two small patches below for propagating the necessary inputs for libxml2
and libxslt.  These should probably be applied to core-updates, right?
Notably, these patches triggers a rebuild of subversion.

Once these patches are applied, would it be a good idea to go through
the packages that depend on libxml2 and libxslt and remove the now
propagated inputs?


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gnu-libxml2-Propagate-zlib.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 938 bytes --]

From a86da0014e02aa73b1e7554edc9c0cd580608c9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:59:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: libxml2: Propagate zlib.

* gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2): Propagate zlib input.
---
 gnu/packages/xml.scm | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/xml.scm b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
index f2b3baa..ae2227f 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xml.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
@@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ things the parser might find in the XML document (like start tags).")
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (home-page "http://www.xmlsoft.org/")
     (synopsis "C parser for XML")
-    (inputs `(("zlib" ,zlib)))
+    (propagated-inputs
+     `(("zlib" ,zlib))) ;; -lz is in the .pc file
     (native-inputs `(("perl" ,perl)
                      ("python" ,python-2))) ; incompatible with Python 3 (print syntax)
 
-- 
2.1.4


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #3: 0002-gnu-libxslt-Propagate-libxml2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1168 bytes --]

From 44675222f65f3e539dd66ff604ab97f0ef3c55de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 21:12:20 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: libxslt: Propagate libxml2.

* gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxslt): Propagate libxml2.
---
 gnu/packages/xml.scm | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/xml.scm b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
index ae2227f..675a3ff 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xml.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
@@ -118,9 +118,9 @@ things the parser might find in the XML document (like start tags).")
     (home-page "http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/index.html")
     (synopsis "C library for applying XSLT stylesheets to XML documents")
     (inputs `(("libgcrypt" ,libgcrypt)
-              ("libxml2" ,libxml2)
-              ("python" ,python-wrapper)
-              ("zlib" ,zlib)))
+              ("python" ,python-wrapper)))
+    (propagated-inputs
+     `(("libxml2" ,libxml2))) ;; -lxml2 is in the .pc file
     (description
      "Libxslt is an XSLT C library developed for the GNOME project.  It is
 based on libxml for XML parsing, tree manipulation and XPath support.")
-- 
2.1.4


[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 136 bytes --]


-- 
David Thompson
Web Developer - Free Software Foundation - http://fsf.org
GPG Key: 0FF1D807
Support the FSF: https://fsf.org/donate

Re: [PATCHES] Propagate inputs for libxml2 and libxslt

[Andreas Enge]

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:28:35AM -0500, David Thompson wrote:
> Two small patches below for propagating the necessary inputs for libxml2
> and libxslt.  These should probably be applied to core-updates, right?
> Notably, these patches triggers a rebuild of subversion.
> 
> Once these patches are applied, would it be a good idea to go through
> the packages that depend on libxml2 and libxslt and remove the now
> propagated inputs?

I would say "yes" to all.

Andreas

Re: [PATCHES] Propagate inputs for libxml2 and libxslt

[Ludovic Courtès]

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:28:35AM -0500, David Thompson wrote:
>> Two small patches below for propagating the necessary inputs for libxml2
>> and libxslt.  These should probably be applied to core-updates, right?
>> Notably, these patches triggers a rebuild of subversion.
>> 
>> Once these patches are applied, would it be a good idea to go through
>> the packages that depend on libxml2 and libxslt and remove the now
>> propagated inputs?
>
> I would say "yes" to all.

Me too!

Ludo’.