From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#22831: [PATCH 2/2] WIP: gnu: openssl: Restrict allowed references for openssl. Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 09:42:41 +0100 Message-ID: <877fhll18e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160301072025.GA26797@jasmine> <877fhmorj1.fsf@gnu.org> <20160301210440.GA18336@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52651) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ab2N4-0003Ui-Qz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 03:43:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ab2N4-00056S-12 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 03:43:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ab2N3-00056N-U7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 03:43:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ab2N3-0000E2-P0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 03:43:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160301210440.GA18336@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:04:40 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: 22831@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:46:26PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Leo Famulari skribis: >>=20 >> > From 00807e4421757f8d9204f1601de9a8286a408f91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > From: Leo Famulari >> > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:24:20 -0500 >> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openssl: Restrict allowed references for openssl. >> > >> > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl)[arguments]: Add #:allowed-references. >>=20 >> For some reason I hadn=E2=80=99t seen it in M-x debbugs-gnu for this rep= ort >> today, but the patch looks good to me! >>=20 >> If we apply it now, it won=E2=80=99t trigger a rebuild (yay!), but will = still >> trigger a bunch of regrafting, which is slightly annoying. What about >> applying it in the next =E2=80=98security-updates=E2=80=99 branch? > > Sure. Is it okay if I create that branch? Sure, no problem. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.