From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: Questions about "guix pull" Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:18:43 -0800 Message-ID: <877fhkmep8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8760xnra9y.fsf@gmail.com> <87egc1erk6.fsf@gnu.org> <20160224212511.GA5933@solar> <87h9guxdyq.fsf@gnu.org> <20160227191012.GA5550@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abJms-000566-Ko for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 22:18:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abJmp-0007DM-G3 for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 22:18:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160227191012.GA5550@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:10:12 -0500") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: Thank you all for the thoughtful responses - and the patch! The new copy of the documentation makes things much clearer. Chris