From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnunet-gtk: adds --with-gnunet to configure-flags Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 19:16:08 +0100 Message-ID: <877fhbo6tz.fsf@grrlz.net> References: <87oaapx2kd.fsf@grrlz.net> <87twkh81r0.fsf@grrlz.net> <20160309175223.GA30271@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adifJ-0006hi-MF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:16:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adifA-0003Wb-9r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:16:53 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adifA-0003WX-3v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:16:48 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adif2-0001AZ-Ed for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 19:16:40 +0100 Received: from xd9bb902d.dyn.telefonica.de ([217.187.144.45]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 19:16:40 +0100 Received: from niasterisk by xd9bb902d.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 19:16:40 +0100 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge writes: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> > Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too >> > old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development >> > network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and >> > gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will >> > default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be >> > installed explicitly. >> The reply to my bug report said something similar. If version 0.10.1 is >> so old that upstream suggest taking the latest from SVN I suppose we >> should do this too. > > I would argue that if upstream cannot be bothered to make a stable release > every once in a while, this is not our business, unless there are dependent > packages that stop working. > > On the other hand, as I fear that the number of users of the current gnunet > is very limited, it probably does not hurt to update it with the version > number 0.10.1-1-xxx for some svn checkout xxx. I am currently working on it, see also my latest Email to guix-devel including the whys and tl;drs. > Andreas > > > -- ng personal contact: http://krosos.sdf.org EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/Echt_Dezentrales_Netz/en